Sat. April 18, 2015 Get Published  Get Alerts
HOME  |LOGIN
ABOUT | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US
Climate Smart Aid Is Anything But

Comments(0)
By William Yeatman

International organizations like the World Bank and the United Nations are supposed to help the world’s poor escape poverty, but fully convinced they are doing good, these development agencies are pushing an anti-development agenda.

Now here’s an inconvenient truth: curbing the planet’s carbon footprint necessarily slows economic growth, the primary engine of human well-fare. International aid organizations need to carefully consider the impact of the climate “solutions” they advocate, lest they do more harm than good.

The International Energy Agency estimates that it would cost $45 trillion through 2050 to mitigate global warming through efforts aimed at “greening” the global economy. Most of that would be spent in developing countries, to prevent them from fueling their growing economies with hydrocarbon energy sources like coal and oil. These fossil fuels are cheap and still plentiful, but burning them to create energy frees the CO² they store, contributing to climate change.

Raising hundreds of billions of dollars a year to finance a global green energy revolution is a key component of current negotiations for a successor climate treaty to the Kyoto Protocol. In fact, European Union Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas recently declared, “No money, no deal.” And clean energy aid was a topic of discussion at last month’s Major Economies Meeting, hosted by the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama.

Naturally, international aid agencies are jockeying for position to broker this wealth transfer.

United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said that his organization is the “natural arena” for coordinated international action on climate change. To that end the U.N. operates two programs to facilitate the flow of climate mitigation aid to developing countries—the Global Environment Facility and the Clean Development Mechanism.

Not to be outdone, the World Bank recently unveiled a “Strategic Framework” for global warming and development that calls for “unprecedented global cooperation” for the “transfer of finance and technology from developed to developing countries.” The Bank established a Carbon Finance Unit and several Carbon Investment Funds to distribute climate change mitigation aid.

Besides the inefficiencies inherent to duplicative bureaucracies, there are major problems with this “climate smart” approach to development. For starters, it is unlikely that Western bureaucrats can create a green energy infrastructure in developing countries. The history of development assistance is littered with abandoned projects backed by the best of intentions. Already there is evidence that climate aid is more of the same.

Under the Kyoto Protocol, for example, companies subject to climate regulations can meet their carbon “cap” by paying for emissions reduction projects in developing countries. According to the journal Nature, the U.N. certified $6 billions’ worth of emissions “savings” for reductions in HFC-23, a potent greenhouse gas. Yet removing the HFC-23 cost $130 million. That’s a lot of waste.

There are also ethical considerations. A coal-fired power plant may offend environmentalist sensibilities, but it would be a blessing for the almost 2 billion people in the world today who use charcoal, dung, and wood to heat and cook.

In his book, Global Crises, Global Solutions, Danish statistician Bjørn Lomborg persuasively argues that humanity faces many problems that are more pressing than warming decades down the road. After all, what good is a slightly cooler planet a century from now to a child dying of malaria today? In terms of saving lives, Lomborg shows why climate change mitigation is an inferior, albeit far less ‘sexy’, investment to water sanitation and halting disease.

Aid agencies should also consider forgone economic development. The U.N. and the World Bank want to redistribute trillions of dollars to create new green energy infrastructure whereas in the free market these scarce resources would be allocated to create wealth. In a globalized world, inefficiencies of this magnitude lower the tide and all boats with it.

Slowing economic growth has very real human consequences, such as fewer schools, worse health care, and lower environmental quality. That’s why a richer-but-warmer future is better for human well being than a poorer-but-cooler future, according to Indur Goklany, author of The Improving State of the World.

Instead of economically harmful global warming policies, development agencies should concentrate their considerable institutional knowledge on advancing pro-growth policies, like trade liberalization. Today, free trade needs an influential booster like the World Bank. Energy intensive export industries in developing countries are threatened by carbon taxes imposed by rich countries, under the pretext of fighting climate change. Retaliatory tariffs would be likely, which could easily escalate into a global trade war.

That would be a tragedy. By allowing developing countries to use their comparative advantage—inexpensive labor—international free trade has proven the fastest route out of poverty for hundreds of millions of people.

To avoid giving atmospheric chemistry priority over human welfare, the aid industry should ensure that the risks of global warming policies are considered as rigorously as the risks of global warming itself.


William Yeatman is an energy policy analyst at the Competitive Enterprise Institute.




Comments in Chronological order (0 total comments)

Report Abuse
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
International Affairs
Forum - (2014 Issue 1)

Available Now
ANNOUNCEMENTS
THE WORLD'S DISCUSSING...
04/30/2015: Media Briefing: Summit of the Americas More
04/30/2015: Promoting Peace and Prosperity in Honduras: A Conversation with His Excellency Juan Orlando Hernández, President of the Republic of Honduras More
04/24/2015: Fiscal Policy in Latin America: Lessons and Legacies of the Global Financial Crisis More
04/21/2015: Does Russian Nationalism have a Future after Ukraine? More
04/18/2015: Book Release: Ukraine: What Went Wrong and How to Fix It More
04/17/2015: A Preview: Japanese Prime Minister Abe’s Visit to the U.S. More
04/17/2015: 25 Years Since the Baltic Revolution: Marking Accomplishments, Facing Challenges More
04/17/2015: Arun Jaitley on Tax Reforms in India: Vision for the Future More
04/17/2015: Ukraine's Bond Restructuring: Surgery, Conspiracy, and Campaign More
04/17/2015: Russia's Bond: It's Official! (... and Private ... and Anything Else It Wants to Be ...) More
04/17/2015: Dijsselbloem: Further Steps towards a Thriving Economic and Monetary Union More
04/17/2015: VIDEO: German and Greek finance ministers speak at Brookings, offer different views on eurozone issues More
04/17/2015: VIDEO: German and Greek finance ministers speak at Brookings, offer different views on eurozone issues More
04/17/2015: Greece's big nowhere More
04/17/2015: Greece's big nowhere More
04/17/2015: Guilherme Lichand is Leading the Way in Innovation More
04/17/2015: Overcoming corporate short-termism: Blackrock's chairman weighs in More
04/17/2015: Further Steps towards a Thriving Economic and Monetary Union More
04/17/2015: Event: Further Steps towards a Thriving Economic and Monetary Union More
04/17/2015: Africa in the news: AGOA up for renewal, IMF and World Bank downgrade African GDP estimates, U.S. supports African CDC, and Kenya wants to close refugee camp More
04/17/2015: Africa in the news: AGOA up for renewal, IMF and World Bank downgrade African GDP estimates, U.S. supports African CDC, and Kenya wants to close refugee camp More
04/17/2015: Margrethe Vestager: Agenda for European Competition Policy More
04/17/2015: Is there a parent penalty? More
04/17/2015: Book Release Event: Ukraine: What Went Wrong and How to Fix It More
04/17/2015: Book Release Event: Ukraine: What Went Wrong and How to Fix It More
04/17/2015: Stock buybacks: From retain-and reinvest to downsize-and-distribute More
04/17/2015: News Release: New Book on Ukraine Calls for Sweeping Political, Economic, and Government Reforms More
04/16/2015: Remembering WWII: the 70th Anniversary of Victory More
04/16/2015: El mundo, a la expectativa del proceso de paz More
04/16/2015: China and Latin America: Seeking a Path to Sustainable Development More
04/16/2015: Agenda for European Competition Policy More
04/16/2015: Event: Agenda for European Competition Policy More
04/16/2015: Changing composition of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court: New designees More
04/16/2015: World War II is also not over in Asia More
04/16/2015: Real Value of China’s FX Reserves is Essentially Flat More
04/16/2015: Climate Change's False Illusion of Progress More
04/16/2015: Hutchins Roundup: IMF gloomy on growth, higher-ed tax credits questioned, and more More
04/16/2015: Hutchins Roundup: IMF gloomy on growth, higher-ed tax credits questioned, and more More
04/16/2015: The Greek economy and its global partners: A conversation with Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis More
04/16/2015: Where Have All the Arab States Gone? More
04/16/2015: Brazil's Investment: A Maze in One's Own Navel More
04/16/2015: Eurozone at a crossroads (again): A conversation with Wolfgang Schäuble More
04/16/2015: Eurozone at a crossroads (again): A conversation with Wolfgang Schäuble More
04/16/2015: Event: Tax Reforms in India: Vision for the Future More
04/16/2015: Tax Reforms in India: Vision for the Future More
04/16/2015: Global factory: Policy implications from the emergence of global value chains More
04/16/2015: Iraq 2.0: The REAL Reason Hawks Oppose the Iran Deal More
04/16/2015: Leave School Choice to the States More
04/15/2015: Attack Roils Colombian Peace Talks More
04/15/2015: Russian Media and Ukraine’s Domestic Politics More
More...
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2015