Fri. July 11, 2014 Get Published  Get Alerts
HOME  |LOGIN
ABOUT | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US
How to Deal with the Chinese Exchange Rate

Comments(0)
By Dr. David A. Phillips


I’d like to deal with a few important aspects of the long term problem of economic relations between the United States and China, something that has deserved – and received – extensive study and commentary.

The 2010 International Monetary Fund Article IV Report, based on its annual consultations with country governments, concluded that the Chinese currency was substantially below the level that was consistent with “medium-term economic fundamentals.” This meant that it underpriced Chinese exports and overpriced Chinese imports, assisting in a large and rapidly increasing Chinese trade surplus, to the detriment of competing economies. The Chinese authorities disagreed on the interpretation of the evidence and some members of the IMF Executive Board concurred with China. But at the extreme, some U.S. observers thought that the global financial crisis itself could be blamed on the imbalances caused by Chinese monetary and exchange rate policy.

The debate on Chinese exchange rate misalignment has continued since the 1990s. While the United States is concerned about its debt obligations to the Chinese government and its growing competitive disadvantage, at the receiving end of low-priced Chinese imported products, with even more consequences than those facing the U.S., are probably the many developing countries that face Chinese competition. Manufacturing industries of Africa such as textiles and garment production have been unable to survive the relentless competition. There has been a process of de-industrialization in Africa for the last 20 years. While in the short term, poorer economies might be able to defend themselves through a competitive depreciation or real devaluation of their currencies against the dollar, this process merely exacerbates the U.S. current account deficit and the longer term pressure on the dollar.

In the United States, the debate about the Chinese Yuan gathered steam as a result for example of comments by Paul Krugman in 2009 in which he argued that exchange rate misalignment by China was damaging the U.S. and that facing off with the Chinese government was a low risk and justified strategy. He wrote that the pegging of the Yuan to the dollar gave Chinese manufacturing a large cost advantage over its competitors while the undervalued rate was supported by the government’s controls on capital imports and at the same time the government’s action of buying up dollars and investing them outside the country, in for example U.S. Treasuries. This in turn had kept down U.S. interest rates and supported the explosion of risky bank lending. (At the end of 2009, China was the top foreign investor U.S. government debt, with holdings of $900 billion in Treasury securities).

Following the crisis, with interest close to zero as a result of the worldwide recession, the Chinese capital exports simply led to a buildup in liquidity, draining demand from a depressed world economy. Krugman suggested that Chinese “mercantilism” could reduce U.S. employment by around 1.4 million jobs by 2012. He later repeated his argument, stating that China’s currency policy was depressing economic growth in the U.S., Europe and Japan. “If we could get some change in China’s currency policy, it would help the world.”

Despite the certainties of some U.S. and other commentators, and even the unusually single minded statement of the IMF, there remains much disagreement about what determines the correct equilibrium exchange rate on which to base the measure of exchange rate misalignment, if any. The estimate of misalignment is very sensitive to variations to small changes in calculation assumptions such as time periods for estimation. Using various different approaches the estimates of currency misalignment have in fact ranged from significant undervaluation (33 percent or 49 percent) to significant overvaluation (33 percent to as much as 100 percent) and many points in between these extremes. When the World Bank revised downward the estimate of Chinese GDP to take into account Purchasing Power Parity, the estimated undervaluation disappeared.

Even if it was possible to establish whether there was a misalignment, this wouldn’t be the end of the story, for several reasons. First, the “appropriate” exchange rate for targeting would need to be identified and it is not necessarily clear how to do this. Second, the international community would have to judge what should be done about it and which countries, if any, should be compensated. To complicate matters, over the past few years the Chinese have allowed their currency to appreciate slowly against the dollar in both nominal and real terms even as China’s current account surplus has still continued to widen.

While some economic observers rail against Chinese mercantilism and short sightedness, it seems highly probable, given the number of Chinese macroeconomists trained in the United States, that the entire problem is perfectly well understood within the Chinese government; it is also aware that the fate of the United States and Chinese economies are intertwined in trade and monetary co-dependence, and that it’s searching for ways to remedy it. At the same time, it has to be remembered that the Chinese government is responsible for the fate of a nation that comprises about one sixth of humanity, of which a substantial part (approximately 200 million) still live in severe poverty despite the economic progress achieved in the past 20 years. A serious macroeconomic policy mistake by the Chinese authorities could potentially have a far more damaging effect (say in terms of increased unemployment) on the Chinese people than a similar mistake in the United States, whose population consists of about one twentieth of humanity, of whom about 90 percent live at a far more comfortable level than the vast majority of Chinese. Just on this basis it appears to be a very good idea to continue to resolve the global imbalance problem facing China, the United States, and other countries by working together to adopt comprehensive reforms of the exchange rate regime and also domestic structural reforms in their respective countries, including in China the rebalancing of domestic demand toward private consumption through boosting household incomes, and in the U.S. the shift of consumption to savings involving some lowering of relative real wages.

Given the confusion about what constitutes an appropriate exchange rate system, exclusive and aggressive focus on the exchange rate issue is likely to be both ineffective and counter-productive, especially if aggressive tactics are deployed to this single problem. There’s little alternative for the U.S. to diplomacy and persuasion, possibly backed up as a last resort by piecemeal measures such as selective import tariffs t

Comments in Chronological order (0 total comments)

Report Abuse
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
International Affairs
Forum - Fall 2013

BRIC Countries and Social Media
Available Now
ANNOUNCEMENTS
THE WORLD'S DISCUSSING...
07/29/2014: National Security and Climate Change: What Do We Need to Know? More
07/16/2014: Citizens, Subjects, and Slackers: Polish, Russian, and Ukrainian Attitudes Toward Paying Taxes More
07/15/2014: A New Agenda for a New Ukraine: Political, Security, and Social Dimensions More
07/11/2014: BRICS Summit 2014: Agenda and Implications More
07/11/2014: BRICS Summit 2014: Agenda and Implications More
07/11/2014: BRICS Summit 2014: Agenda and Implications More
07/11/2014: The U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit: A Focus on Foreign Direct Investment More
07/10/2014: Global Economic Prospects: Spring 2014 More
07/10/2014: CGD Publication: The Quality of Official Development Assistance (QuODA): Third Edition More
07/10/2014: Governance of Regional Transit Systems More
07/10/2014: Rumors Motivate Central American Kids To Set Out For U.S. Border More
07/10/2014: Brazil Loses Big at World Cup- And Not Just on the Field More
07/10/2014: The Month in U.S.-China Relations (May & June) ?????? More
07/10/2014: Is a Ground Invasion Next in Gaza? More
07/10/2014: U.S.-China Cooperation: RIMPAC and the Strategic and Economic Dialogue More
07/10/2014: Misidentifying the Conflict in Iraq and Syria More
07/10/2014: Iran Headlines: Vienna Talks Progress, Alliance with Iraq, and Trade with Germany More
07/10/2014: Gender Mainstreaming in African Armed Forces More
07/10/2014: Event: Managing the Euro Area Debt Crisis More
07/10/2014: Event: Managing the Euro Area Debt Crisis More
07/10/2014: Managing the Euro Area Debt Crisis More
07/10/2014: Pakistan's Interminable Energy Crisis: Is There Any Way Out? More
07/10/2014: News Release: New Study Examines the Long-Term Sustainability of Euro Area Government Debt More
07/10/2014: Why Piketty's Wealth Data Are Worthless More
07/10/2014: Legislation to Reform the Federal Reserve on Its 100-Year Anniversary [pdf] More
07/10/2014: The Quality of Official Development Assistance (QuODA): Third Edition More
07/10/2014: Should the US follow the UK to a Universal Credit? More
07/10/2014: Leveling the Transnational Playing Field More
07/09/2014: CGD Event: Girl Summit DC 2014 More
07/09/2014: Development blog: The Elusive Quest for Women's Land Rights More
07/09/2014: World Economic Forum Report on Mega-regional Trade Agreements More
07/09/2014: Global Challenges in a Nuclear Armed World More
07/09/2014: Get Bosses Out of Health Insurance Altogether More
07/09/2014: Iran Headlines: Afghan Presidential Election, Drafting the Agreement Text in Vienna, and Divorce More
07/09/2014: Iran Headlines: Afghan Presidential Election, Drafting the Agreement Text in Vienna, and Divorce More
07/09/2014: Event: Mega-regional Trade Agreements: Game-Changers or Costly Distractions for the World Trading System? More
07/09/2014: World Economic Forum Report on Mega-regional Trade Agreements More
07/09/2014: Eric Olson on the Influx of Unaccompanied Immigrant Children More
07/09/2014: Design Matters: The Future of School Choice More
07/09/2014: A Step Forward for Chinese Local Government Debt More
07/09/2014: A Critical Moment in Afghanistan's History More
07/09/2014: A Worrying Trend With No Quick Fix More
07/09/2014: A Transoceanic Canal for Nicaragua? More
07/09/2014: A Transoceanic Canal for Nicaragua? More
07/09/2014: A Transoceanic Canal for Nicaragua? More
07/09/2014: Three Tips for the High Commissioner for Human Rights More
07/09/2014: Three Tips for the High Commissioner for Human Rights More
07/09/2014: Why Washington Needs a New North Korea Strategy More
07/09/2014: Obama and the Syria Two-Step More
07/09/2014: A Real Fix for Credit Ratings More
More...
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2014