Thu. July 10, 2014 Get Published  Get Alerts
HOME  |LOGIN
ABOUT | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US
Frictions in the South China Sea - Chinese strategic mistake

Comments(0)
(Why Indonesia and Japan are pivotal in Asia)


On the eastern, ascendant flank of Eurasian continent, the Chinese vertigo economy is overheated and too-well integrated in the petrodollar system. Beijing, presently, cannot contemplate or afford to allocate any resources in a search for an alternative. (The Sino economy is low-wage- and labor intensive- centered. Chinese revenues are heavily dependent on exports and Chinese reserves are predominantly a mix of the USD and US Treasury bonds.) To sustain itself as a single socio-political and formidably performing economic entity, the People’s Republic requires more energy and less external dependency. Domestically, the demographic-migratory pressures are huge, regional demands are high, and expectations are brewing. Considering its best external energy dependency equalizer (and inner cohesion solidifier), China seems to be turning to its military upgrade rather than towards the resolute alternative energy/Green Tech investments – as it has no time, plan and resources to do both at once. Inattentive of a broader picture, Beijing (probably falsely) believes that lasting containment, especially in the South China Sea, is unbearable, and that – at the same time – fossil-fuels are available (e.g., in Africa and the Gulf), and even cheaper with the help of warships. 1

In effect, the forthcoming Chinese military buildup will only strengthen the existing, and open-up new, bilateral security deals of neighboring countries, primarily with the US – as nowadays in Asia, none wants to be a passive downloader. Ultimately, it may create a politico-military isolation (and financial burden) for China that would just consequently justify and (politically and financially) cheapen the bolder American military presence in Asia-Pacific, especially in the South China Sea. It perfectly adds up to the intensified demonization of China in parts of influential Western media. Hence, the Chinese grab for fossil fuels or its military competition for naval control is not a challenge but rather a boost for the US Asia-Pacific – even an overall – posture. (Managing the contraction of its overseas projection and commitments – some would call it managing the decline of an empire – the US does not fail to note that nowadays half of the world’s merchant tonnage passes though the South China Sea. Therefore, the US will exploit any regional territorial dispute and other frictions to its own security benefit, including the costs sharing of its military presence by the local partners, as to maintain pivotal on the maritime edge of Asia that arches from the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean, Malacca and South China Sea up to the northwest–central Pacific.) A real challenge is always to optimize the (moral political and financial) costs in meeting the national strategic objectives. In this case, it would be a resolute turn of China towards green technology, coupled with the firm buildup of the Asian multilateralism. Without a grand rapprochement to the champions of multilateralism in Asia, which are Indonesia, India and Japan, there is no environment for China to seriously evolve and emerge as a formidable, lasting, and trusted global leader warships .

Opting for either strategic choice will reverberate in the dynamic Asia–Pacific theatre. However, the messages are diametrical: An assertive military – alienates, new technology – attracts neighbors. Finally, armies conquer (and spend) while technology builds (and accumulates)! At this point, any eventual accelerated armament in the Asia-Pacific theatre would only strengthen the hydrocarbon status quo. With its present configuration, it is hard to imagine that anybody can outplay the US in the petro-security, petro-financial and petro-military global playground in the following few decades. Given the planetary petro-financial-tech-military causal constellations, this type of confrontation is so well mastered by and would further only benefit the US and the closest of its allies.

Within the OECD/IEA grouping, or closely; the G-8 (the states with resources, infrastructure, tradition of and know-how to advance the fundamental technological breakthroughs), it is only Japan that may seriously consider a Green/Renewable-tech U-turn. Tokyo’s external energy dependencies are stark and long-lasting. After the recent nuclear trauma, Japan will need a few years to (psychologically and economically) absorb the shock – but it will learn a lesson. For such a huge formidable economy and considerable demography, situated on a small land-mass which is repeatedly brutalized by devastating natural catastrophes (and dependent on yet another disruptive external influence – Arab oil), it might be that a decisive shift towards green energy is the only way to survive, revive, and eventually to emancipate.

An important part of the US–Japan security treaty is the US energy supply lines security guaranty given to (the post-WWII demilitarized) Tokyo. After the recent earthquake-tsunami-radiation armageddon, as well as witnessing the current Chinese military/naval noise, Japan will inevitably rethink and revisit its energy policy, as well as the composition of its primary energy mix.

Tokyo is well aware that the Asian geostrategic myopias are strong and lasting, as many Asian states are either locked up in their narrow regionalisms or/and entrenched in their economic egoisms. Finally, Japan is the only Asian country that has clearly learned from its own modern history, all about the limits of hard power projection and the strong repulsive forces that come in aftermath from the neighbors. Their own pre-modern and modern history does not offer a similar experience to other two Asian heavyweights, China and India. That indicates the Far East as a probable zone of the Green-tech excellence and a place of attraction for many Asians in the decade to come.


1 More on the pan-Asian architectures in my 2011 work: “Preventive diplomacy: No Asian century…”



Anis H. Bajrektarevic, Geopolitics of Energy Editorial Member

Chairperson for Intl. Law & Global Pol. Studies

Vienna, 20 MAY 2012


contact: anis@bajrektarevic.eu

Comments in Chronological order (0 total comments)

Report Abuse
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
International Affairs
Forum - Fall 2013

BRIC Countries and Social Media
Available Now
ANNOUNCEMENTS
THE WORLD'S DISCUSSING...
07/29/2014: National Security and Climate Change: What Do We Need to Know? More
07/16/2014: Citizens, Subjects, and Slackers: Polish, Russian, and Ukrainian Attitudes Toward Paying Taxes More
07/15/2014: A New Agenda for a New Ukraine: Political, Security, and Social Dimensions More
07/10/2014: Leveling the Transnational Playing Field More
07/09/2014: CGD Event: Girl Summit DC 2014 More
07/09/2014: Development blog: The Elusive Quest for Women's Land Rights More
07/09/2014: World Economic Forum Report on Mega-regional Trade Agreements More
07/09/2014: Global Challenges in a Nuclear Armed World More
07/09/2014: Get Bosses Out of Health Insurance Altogether More
07/09/2014: Iran Headlines: Afghan Presidential Election, Drafting the Agreement Text in Vienna, and Divorce More
07/09/2014: Iran Headlines: Afghan Presidential Election, Drafting the Agreement Text in Vienna, and Divorce More
07/09/2014: Event: Mega-regional Trade Agreements: Game-Changers or Costly Distractions for the World Trading System? More
07/09/2014: World Economic Forum Report on Mega-regional Trade Agreements More
07/09/2014: Eric Olson on the Influx of Unaccompanied Immigrant Children More
07/09/2014: Design Matters: The Future of School Choice More
07/09/2014: A Step Forward for Chinese Local Government Debt More
07/09/2014: A Critical Moment in Afghanistan's History More
07/09/2014: A Worrying Trend With No Quick Fix More
07/09/2014: A Transoceanic Canal for Nicaragua? More
07/09/2014: A Transoceanic Canal for Nicaragua? More
07/09/2014: A Transoceanic Canal for Nicaragua? More
07/09/2014: Three Tips for the High Commissioner for Human Rights More
07/09/2014: Three Tips for the High Commissioner for Human Rights More
07/09/2014: Why Washington Needs a New North Korea Strategy More
07/09/2014: Obama and the Syria Two-Step More
07/09/2014: A Real Fix for Credit Ratings More
07/09/2014: The Right Way to Partition Iraq (If Necessary) More
07/09/2014: Political Reform in China: Elections, Public Goods, and Income Distribution More
07/09/2014: Unaccompanied Minors and Unintended Consequences More
07/09/2014: Modi Should End His Honeymoon More
07/09/2014: Dangers to U.S. Liberties We Missed on July 4 More
07/08/2014: NAFTA 20 Years Later: Setting the Record Straight More
07/08/2014: Teleconference—China’s Broadening Footprint in Latin America: From Beijing to Buenos Aires More
07/08/2014: Russia Opens a Eurasian Pandora's Box More
07/08/2014: Iran Headlines: Silence in Vienna, Calls for Impeachment, and Kuwait More
07/08/2014: Former Scholar Kalyani Shankar Discusses Her Book Pandora's Daughters More
07/08/2014: Kyiv’s Atrocities? A More Nuanced Look at the Ukraine Crisis More
07/08/2014: Development blog: Mega-Regional Trade Agreements: Boon or Bane for Developing Countries? More
07/08/2014: Getting it Right in Afghanistan More
07/08/2014: Development blog: Volvo Standards and Transformational Infrastructure: Lessons for the Old and New Development Banks. More
07/08/2014: Remembering Eduard Shevardnadze More
07/08/2014: Working Paper 14-2: Labor Market Slack in the United Kingdom [pdf] More
07/08/2014: What We Won: America's Secret War In Afghanistan, 1979-1989 More
07/08/2014: What We Won: America's Secret War In Afghanistan, 1979-1989 More
07/08/2014: Acting Out Gentrification: Theater as Community Engagement More
07/08/2014: How Obama Can Fix Immigration without Congress More
07/08/2014: Global Prosperity Wonkcast: Africa's Data Revolution – Amanda Glassman More
07/08/2014: Stopping Distance: What Every 16-Year-Old Knows about Climate Change More
07/08/2014: Drug Cartels Are Causing a Refugee Crisis More
07/08/2014: Unaccompanied Minors and Unintended Consequences More
More...
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2014