Tue. November 25, 2014 Get Published  Get Alerts
HOME  |LOGIN
ABOUT | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US
Frictions in the South China Sea - Chinese strategic mistake

Comments(0)
(Why Indonesia and Japan are pivotal in Asia)


On the eastern, ascendant flank of Eurasian continent, the Chinese vertigo economy is overheated and too-well integrated in the petrodollar system. Beijing, presently, cannot contemplate or afford to allocate any resources in a search for an alternative. (The Sino economy is low-wage- and labor intensive- centered. Chinese revenues are heavily dependent on exports and Chinese reserves are predominantly a mix of the USD and US Treasury bonds.) To sustain itself as a single socio-political and formidably performing economic entity, the People’s Republic requires more energy and less external dependency. Domestically, the demographic-migratory pressures are huge, regional demands are high, and expectations are brewing. Considering its best external energy dependency equalizer (and inner cohesion solidifier), China seems to be turning to its military upgrade rather than towards the resolute alternative energy/Green Tech investments – as it has no time, plan and resources to do both at once. Inattentive of a broader picture, Beijing (probably falsely) believes that lasting containment, especially in the South China Sea, is unbearable, and that – at the same time – fossil-fuels are available (e.g., in Africa and the Gulf), and even cheaper with the help of warships. 1

In effect, the forthcoming Chinese military buildup will only strengthen the existing, and open-up new, bilateral security deals of neighboring countries, primarily with the US – as nowadays in Asia, none wants to be a passive downloader. Ultimately, it may create a politico-military isolation (and financial burden) for China that would just consequently justify and (politically and financially) cheapen the bolder American military presence in Asia-Pacific, especially in the South China Sea. It perfectly adds up to the intensified demonization of China in parts of influential Western media. Hence, the Chinese grab for fossil fuels or its military competition for naval control is not a challenge but rather a boost for the US Asia-Pacific – even an overall – posture. (Managing the contraction of its overseas projection and commitments – some would call it managing the decline of an empire – the US does not fail to note that nowadays half of the world’s merchant tonnage passes though the South China Sea. Therefore, the US will exploit any regional territorial dispute and other frictions to its own security benefit, including the costs sharing of its military presence by the local partners, as to maintain pivotal on the maritime edge of Asia that arches from the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean, Malacca and South China Sea up to the northwest–central Pacific.) A real challenge is always to optimize the (moral political and financial) costs in meeting the national strategic objectives. In this case, it would be a resolute turn of China towards green technology, coupled with the firm buildup of the Asian multilateralism. Without a grand rapprochement to the champions of multilateralism in Asia, which are Indonesia, India and Japan, there is no environment for China to seriously evolve and emerge as a formidable, lasting, and trusted global leader warships .

Opting for either strategic choice will reverberate in the dynamic Asia–Pacific theatre. However, the messages are diametrical: An assertive military – alienates, new technology – attracts neighbors. Finally, armies conquer (and spend) while technology builds (and accumulates)! At this point, any eventual accelerated armament in the Asia-Pacific theatre would only strengthen the hydrocarbon status quo. With its present configuration, it is hard to imagine that anybody can outplay the US in the petro-security, petro-financial and petro-military global playground in the following few decades. Given the planetary petro-financial-tech-military causal constellations, this type of confrontation is so well mastered by and would further only benefit the US and the closest of its allies.

Within the OECD/IEA grouping, or closely; the G-8 (the states with resources, infrastructure, tradition of and know-how to advance the fundamental technological breakthroughs), it is only Japan that may seriously consider a Green/Renewable-tech U-turn. Tokyo’s external energy dependencies are stark and long-lasting. After the recent nuclear trauma, Japan will need a few years to (psychologically and economically) absorb the shock – but it will learn a lesson. For such a huge formidable economy and considerable demography, situated on a small land-mass which is repeatedly brutalized by devastating natural catastrophes (and dependent on yet another disruptive external influence – Arab oil), it might be that a decisive shift towards green energy is the only way to survive, revive, and eventually to emancipate.

An important part of the US–Japan security treaty is the US energy supply lines security guaranty given to (the post-WWII demilitarized) Tokyo. After the recent earthquake-tsunami-radiation armageddon, as well as witnessing the current Chinese military/naval noise, Japan will inevitably rethink and revisit its energy policy, as well as the composition of its primary energy mix.

Tokyo is well aware that the Asian geostrategic myopias are strong and lasting, as many Asian states are either locked up in their narrow regionalisms or/and entrenched in their economic egoisms. Finally, Japan is the only Asian country that has clearly learned from its own modern history, all about the limits of hard power projection and the strong repulsive forces that come in aftermath from the neighbors. Their own pre-modern and modern history does not offer a similar experience to other two Asian heavyweights, China and India. That indicates the Far East as a probable zone of the Green-tech excellence and a place of attraction for many Asians in the decade to come.


1 More on the pan-Asian architectures in my 2011 work: “Preventive diplomacy: No Asian century…”



Anis H. Bajrektarevic, Geopolitics of Energy Editorial Member

Chairperson for Intl. Law & Global Pol. Studies

Vienna, 20 MAY 2012


contact: anis@bajrektarevic.eu

Comments in Chronological order (0 total comments)

Report Abuse
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
International Affairs
Forum - (2014 Issue 1)

Available Now
ANNOUNCEMENTS
THE WORLD'S DISCUSSING...
11/25/2014: Iran-P5+1 Nuclear Negotiations: the Road Ahead More
11/25/2014: CGD Event: Winners and Losers of Globalization: Political Implications of Inequality More
11/24/2014: Development blog: All Technology Leapfrogging Is Not the Same (Why Phones ? Energy) More
11/24/2014: Development blog: ‘Taxing across Borders’: An Academic Milestone More
11/24/2014: Bury Lenin's Body and the Rest of Communism: In Red Square He Lies in State, Mocking Humanity More
11/24/2014: Safeguarding the Role of Displaced Communities in Decisions about Relocations More
11/24/2014: Safeguarding the Role of Displaced Communities in Decisions about Relocations More
11/24/2014: Reviving Growth: A Cato Online Forum More
11/22/2014: The School Religious Holidays Problem Is Really a Public Schooling Problem More
11/21/2014: Development blog: Trade Growth Is Slowing; Is Protectionism to Blame? More
11/21/2014: Obama’s Act Gives Hope to Four Million Immigrants, but More is Needed More
11/21/2014: Cuba’s Foreign Investment Invitation: Insights into Internal Struggles More
11/21/2014: How Places Can Make the Executive Actions on Immigration Work More
11/21/2014: Republican Division on an Immigration Response Highlights a GOP Challenge More
11/21/2014: Currency Wars, the Ruble and Keynes More
11/21/2014: Inequality and Envy More
11/21/2014: Bad Laws Lead to Bad Executive Orders More
11/21/2014: Bring China and Its Neighbors Under the INF Missile Treaty More
11/21/2014: NSA Reform: Not Dead Yet More
11/21/2014: CGD Publication: To Charge or Not to Charge: Evidence from a Health Products Experiment in Uganda - Working Paper 387 More
11/20/2014: Obama’s Immigration Order Isn’t a Power Grab More
11/20/2014: Why a Temporary Immigration Solution is Still Problematic for STEM Workers More
11/20/2014: Development blog: Giddy Optimism on 2015 More
11/20/2014: Brookings Experts on Immigration Reform and Executive Action More
11/20/2014: Japan in Recession: Questions to Ask on the Future of Abenomics More
11/20/2014: Japan in Recession: Questions to Ask on the Future of Abenomics More
11/20/2014: Development blog: Payment by Results: One Size Doesn't Fit All More
11/20/2014: A Refugee and Parole Program for Central American Minors More
11/20/2014: A Refugee and Parole Program for Central American Minors More
11/20/2014: What the Top Eight Freight Corridors Tell Us About Trade More
11/20/2014: Even Piecemeal Immigration Reform Could Boost the U.S. Economy More
11/20/2014: Four Realities about Executive Actions; Moving Beyond the Rhetoric of Immigration Reform More
11/20/2014: Hutchins Roundup: Unemployment Insurance, Emerging Markets, and More More
11/20/2014: Hutchins Roundup: Unemployment Insurance, Emerging Markets, and More More
11/20/2014: A Constitutional Amendment on Marriage More
11/20/2014: America's Leadership Crisis--and Its Economic Implications More
11/20/2014: An Awkward Celebration in the Heart of Europe More
11/20/2014: What the Inequality Warriors Really Want More
11/20/2014: On Obama and Immigration More
11/20/2014: Obama’s Immigration Executive Order is Mixed Bag for Tech Sector More
11/20/2014: CGD Event: Predicting Partnerships: Which Countries Will the Millennium Challenge Corporation Select This Year? More
11/19/2014: Global Health blog: After Ebola: Five Lessons for Outbreak Response More
11/19/2014: Development blog: The Baker’s Dozen: A 748-Year-Old Solution for Climate Offsets More
11/19/2014: Development blog: How to Publish Your Government Contracts More
11/19/2014: Development blog: Jurisdictional Forest Offsets: California Dreamin’? More
11/19/2014: Understanding the Ebola Outbreak and How to Respond in the Future More
11/19/2014: Havel's Idealistic Governance, Version 2.0 More
11/19/2014: Why Congress Should Legalize Pot More
11/19/2014: DACA Offers Lessons for Executive Action on Immigration More
11/19/2014: Get the Fiscal House in Order More
More...
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2014