Tue. September 30, 2014 Get Published  Get Alerts
HOME  |LOGIN
ABOUT | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US
Frictions in the South China Sea - Chinese strategic mistake

Comments(0)
(Why Indonesia and Japan are pivotal in Asia)


On the eastern, ascendant flank of Eurasian continent, the Chinese vertigo economy is overheated and too-well integrated in the petrodollar system. Beijing, presently, cannot contemplate or afford to allocate any resources in a search for an alternative. (The Sino economy is low-wage- and labor intensive- centered. Chinese revenues are heavily dependent on exports and Chinese reserves are predominantly a mix of the USD and US Treasury bonds.) To sustain itself as a single socio-political and formidably performing economic entity, the People’s Republic requires more energy and less external dependency. Domestically, the demographic-migratory pressures are huge, regional demands are high, and expectations are brewing. Considering its best external energy dependency equalizer (and inner cohesion solidifier), China seems to be turning to its military upgrade rather than towards the resolute alternative energy/Green Tech investments – as it has no time, plan and resources to do both at once. Inattentive of a broader picture, Beijing (probably falsely) believes that lasting containment, especially in the South China Sea, is unbearable, and that – at the same time – fossil-fuels are available (e.g., in Africa and the Gulf), and even cheaper with the help of warships. 1

In effect, the forthcoming Chinese military buildup will only strengthen the existing, and open-up new, bilateral security deals of neighboring countries, primarily with the US – as nowadays in Asia, none wants to be a passive downloader. Ultimately, it may create a politico-military isolation (and financial burden) for China that would just consequently justify and (politically and financially) cheapen the bolder American military presence in Asia-Pacific, especially in the South China Sea. It perfectly adds up to the intensified demonization of China in parts of influential Western media. Hence, the Chinese grab for fossil fuels or its military competition for naval control is not a challenge but rather a boost for the US Asia-Pacific – even an overall – posture. (Managing the contraction of its overseas projection and commitments – some would call it managing the decline of an empire – the US does not fail to note that nowadays half of the world’s merchant tonnage passes though the South China Sea. Therefore, the US will exploit any regional territorial dispute and other frictions to its own security benefit, including the costs sharing of its military presence by the local partners, as to maintain pivotal on the maritime edge of Asia that arches from the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean, Malacca and South China Sea up to the northwest–central Pacific.) A real challenge is always to optimize the (moral political and financial) costs in meeting the national strategic objectives. In this case, it would be a resolute turn of China towards green technology, coupled with the firm buildup of the Asian multilateralism. Without a grand rapprochement to the champions of multilateralism in Asia, which are Indonesia, India and Japan, there is no environment for China to seriously evolve and emerge as a formidable, lasting, and trusted global leader warships .

Opting for either strategic choice will reverberate in the dynamic Asia–Pacific theatre. However, the messages are diametrical: An assertive military – alienates, new technology – attracts neighbors. Finally, armies conquer (and spend) while technology builds (and accumulates)! At this point, any eventual accelerated armament in the Asia-Pacific theatre would only strengthen the hydrocarbon status quo. With its present configuration, it is hard to imagine that anybody can outplay the US in the petro-security, petro-financial and petro-military global playground in the following few decades. Given the planetary petro-financial-tech-military causal constellations, this type of confrontation is so well mastered by and would further only benefit the US and the closest of its allies.

Within the OECD/IEA grouping, or closely; the G-8 (the states with resources, infrastructure, tradition of and know-how to advance the fundamental technological breakthroughs), it is only Japan that may seriously consider a Green/Renewable-tech U-turn. Tokyo’s external energy dependencies are stark and long-lasting. After the recent nuclear trauma, Japan will need a few years to (psychologically and economically) absorb the shock – but it will learn a lesson. For such a huge formidable economy and considerable demography, situated on a small land-mass which is repeatedly brutalized by devastating natural catastrophes (and dependent on yet another disruptive external influence – Arab oil), it might be that a decisive shift towards green energy is the only way to survive, revive, and eventually to emancipate.

An important part of the US–Japan security treaty is the US energy supply lines security guaranty given to (the post-WWII demilitarized) Tokyo. After the recent earthquake-tsunami-radiation armageddon, as well as witnessing the current Chinese military/naval noise, Japan will inevitably rethink and revisit its energy policy, as well as the composition of its primary energy mix.

Tokyo is well aware that the Asian geostrategic myopias are strong and lasting, as many Asian states are either locked up in their narrow regionalisms or/and entrenched in their economic egoisms. Finally, Japan is the only Asian country that has clearly learned from its own modern history, all about the limits of hard power projection and the strong repulsive forces that come in aftermath from the neighbors. Their own pre-modern and modern history does not offer a similar experience to other two Asian heavyweights, China and India. That indicates the Far East as a probable zone of the Green-tech excellence and a place of attraction for many Asians in the decade to come.


1 More on the pan-Asian architectures in my 2011 work: “Preventive diplomacy: No Asian century…”



Anis H. Bajrektarevic, Geopolitics of Energy Editorial Member

Chairperson for Intl. Law & Global Pol. Studies

Vienna, 20 MAY 2012


contact: anis@bajrektarevic.eu

Comments in Chronological order (0 total comments)

Report Abuse
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
International Affairs
Forum - (2014 Issue 1)

Available Now
ANNOUNCEMENTS
THE WORLD'S DISCUSSING...
12/15/2014: Modern Times in North Korea: Scenes from its Founding Years, 1945-1950 More
12/01/2014: Waking from the Dream: the Struggle for Civil Rights in the Shadow of Martin Luther King More
11/17/2014: The Men Who Lost America: British Leadership, the Revolutionary World, and the Fate of Empire More
10/27/2014: Sino-Soviet Relations and the Dilemmas of Socialist Bloc Cooperation: Czechoslovaks in Shanghai, 1956-57 More
10/20/2014: Empowering Revolution: America, Poland, and the Moderates who Ended the Cold War More
10/14/2014: Scaling Up or Expanding Out? What Happens When Development Programs Grow More
10/06/2014: Is there Hope for Central American Youth? More
10/06/2014: A World More Concrete: Real Estate and the Remaking of Jim Crow South Florida More
10/05/2014: Chinese Companies in Latin America: Economic and Strategic Dimensions More
10/03/2014: "The Last Empire: The Final Days of the Soviet Union" More
10/02/2014: Four Keys for Re-launching the OAS More
10/01/2014: "Putin's Kleptocracy - Who Owns Russia?" More
09/30/2014: Debt Management in an Era of Quantitative Easing: What Should the Treasury and the Fed Do? More
09/30/2014: Debt Management in an Era of Quantitative Easing: What Should the Treasury and the Fed Do? More
09/30/2014: Inside Out, India and China : Local Politics Go Global - with a new preface More
09/30/2014: Crisis Federalism: How the Stimulus Reshaped Federal-State Relations More
09/29/2014: Development blog: New Report Gets Down to Business on Impact Investing and Development More
09/29/2014: CGD Event: Development Co-operation Report 2014 and Why Forests? Why Now? More
09/29/2014: Ukrainian Journalist Mustafa Nayyem to Receive 2014 Ion Ratiu Democracy Award More
09/29/2014: Public Schooling: War without End More
09/29/2014: Is There a New Crack in the West’s Sanctions Regime Against Russia? More
09/29/2014: Performance and Power from Kabuki to Go Go More
09/29/2014: Tailored Engagement: Making Inter-Korean Relations Effective and Sustainable More
09/29/2014: Tailored Engagement: Making Inter-Korean Relations Effective and Sustainable More
09/29/2014: The Evolving Risks of Fragile States and International Terrorism More
09/29/2014: The Evolving Risks of Fragile States and International Terrorism More
09/29/2014: Development blog: What Is the Future of DFID? More
09/29/2014: Hong Kong's Bad Weekend More
09/29/2014: News Release: C. Fred Bergsten Named Swedish American of the Year More
09/29/2014: India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi Visits America: Washington Should Recognize another Emerging Great Power More
09/29/2014: One Year into the TTIP Negotiations: Getting to Yes More
09/27/2014: How ISIS Uses Oil to Fund Terror More
09/27/2014: How ISIS Uses Oil to Fund Terror More
09/26/2014: Russia and US : is a real partnership still possible? More
09/26/2014: What is the reality? - The Expert Take More
09/26/2014: China Chart of the Week: Foreign Investors Flock to Services More
09/26/2014: Hearing of the European High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy More
09/26/2014: PM Modi's US Visit: India Has to Look Like a Superpower to Get US Investors interested Again More
09/26/2014: Eliminating an Existential Threat: the Armenian Genocide, 1915-1916 More
09/26/2014: Africa in the News: African Leaders Propose Climate Commitments; Nigerian Army Arrests Boko Haram Insurgents; South Africa Strikes a Nuclear Deal with Russia More
09/26/2014: Africa in the News: African Leaders Propose Climate Commitments; Nigerian Army Arrests Boko Haram Insurgents; South Africa Strikes a Nuclear Deal with Russia More
09/26/2014: The Great-Power Summit Most Americans Don't Know About More
09/26/2014: Mr. Modi’s Dynamic Diplomatic Debut More
09/26/2014: Brookings Experts on the U.S.-led Strikes on ISIS and Targets in Syria and Iraq More
09/26/2014: Brookings Experts on the U.S.-led Strikes on ISIS and Targets in Syria and Iraq More
09/26/2014: China’s Economy: Outlook, Risks, and Reforms More
09/26/2014: China’s Economy: Outlook, Risks, and Reforms More
09/26/2014: Assessing the Obama Administration’s Iraq-Syria Strategy More
09/26/2014: Picking Up Steam: The Expansion of Chinese Railways in Africa More
09/26/2014: The Global Warming Money Nexus Corrupts Real Climate Research More
More...
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2014