Fri. April 29, 2016 Get Published  Get Alerts
HOME  |LOGIN
ABOUT | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US
Frictions in the South China Sea - Chinese strategic mistake

Comments(0)
(Why Indonesia and Japan are pivotal in Asia)


On the eastern, ascendant flank of Eurasian continent, the Chinese vertigo economy is overheated and too-well integrated in the petrodollar system. Beijing, presently, cannot contemplate or afford to allocate any resources in a search for an alternative. (The Sino economy is low-wage- and labor intensive- centered. Chinese revenues are heavily dependent on exports and Chinese reserves are predominantly a mix of the USD and US Treasury bonds.) To sustain itself as a single socio-political and formidably performing economic entity, the People’s Republic requires more energy and less external dependency. Domestically, the demographic-migratory pressures are huge, regional demands are high, and expectations are brewing. Considering its best external energy dependency equalizer (and inner cohesion solidifier), China seems to be turning to its military upgrade rather than towards the resolute alternative energy/Green Tech investments – as it has no time, plan and resources to do both at once. Inattentive of a broader picture, Beijing (probably falsely) believes that lasting containment, especially in the South China Sea, is unbearable, and that – at the same time – fossil-fuels are available (e.g., in Africa and the Gulf), and even cheaper with the help of warships. 1

In effect, the forthcoming Chinese military buildup will only strengthen the existing, and open-up new, bilateral security deals of neighboring countries, primarily with the US – as nowadays in Asia, none wants to be a passive downloader. Ultimately, it may create a politico-military isolation (and financial burden) for China that would just consequently justify and (politically and financially) cheapen the bolder American military presence in Asia-Pacific, especially in the South China Sea. It perfectly adds up to the intensified demonization of China in parts of influential Western media. Hence, the Chinese grab for fossil fuels or its military competition for naval control is not a challenge but rather a boost for the US Asia-Pacific – even an overall – posture. (Managing the contraction of its overseas projection and commitments – some would call it managing the decline of an empire – the US does not fail to note that nowadays half of the world’s merchant tonnage passes though the South China Sea. Therefore, the US will exploit any regional territorial dispute and other frictions to its own security benefit, including the costs sharing of its military presence by the local partners, as to maintain pivotal on the maritime edge of Asia that arches from the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean, Malacca and South China Sea up to the northwest–central Pacific.) A real challenge is always to optimize the (moral political and financial) costs in meeting the national strategic objectives. In this case, it would be a resolute turn of China towards green technology, coupled with the firm buildup of the Asian multilateralism. Without a grand rapprochement to the champions of multilateralism in Asia, which are Indonesia, India and Japan, there is no environment for China to seriously evolve and emerge as a formidable, lasting, and trusted global leader warships .

Opting for either strategic choice will reverberate in the dynamic Asia–Pacific theatre. However, the messages are diametrical: An assertive military – alienates, new technology – attracts neighbors. Finally, armies conquer (and spend) while technology builds (and accumulates)! At this point, any eventual accelerated armament in the Asia-Pacific theatre would only strengthen the hydrocarbon status quo. With its present configuration, it is hard to imagine that anybody can outplay the US in the petro-security, petro-financial and petro-military global playground in the following few decades. Given the planetary petro-financial-tech-military causal constellations, this type of confrontation is so well mastered by and would further only benefit the US and the closest of its allies.

Within the OECD/IEA grouping, or closely; the G-8 (the states with resources, infrastructure, tradition of and know-how to advance the fundamental technological breakthroughs), it is only Japan that may seriously consider a Green/Renewable-tech U-turn. Tokyo’s external energy dependencies are stark and long-lasting. After the recent nuclear trauma, Japan will need a few years to (psychologically and economically) absorb the shock – but it will learn a lesson. For such a huge formidable economy and considerable demography, situated on a small land-mass which is repeatedly brutalized by devastating natural catastrophes (and dependent on yet another disruptive external influence – Arab oil), it might be that a decisive shift towards green energy is the only way to survive, revive, and eventually to emancipate.

An important part of the US–Japan security treaty is the US energy supply lines security guaranty given to (the post-WWII demilitarized) Tokyo. After the recent earthquake-tsunami-radiation armageddon, as well as witnessing the current Chinese military/naval noise, Japan will inevitably rethink and revisit its energy policy, as well as the composition of its primary energy mix.

Tokyo is well aware that the Asian geostrategic myopias are strong and lasting, as many Asian states are either locked up in their narrow regionalisms or/and entrenched in their economic egoisms. Finally, Japan is the only Asian country that has clearly learned from its own modern history, all about the limits of hard power projection and the strong repulsive forces that come in aftermath from the neighbors. Their own pre-modern and modern history does not offer a similar experience to other two Asian heavyweights, China and India. That indicates the Far East as a probable zone of the Green-tech excellence and a place of attraction for many Asians in the decade to come.


1 More on the pan-Asian architectures in my 2011 work: “Preventive diplomacy: No Asian century…”



Anis H. Bajrektarevic, Geopolitics of Energy Editorial Member

Chairperson for Intl. Law & Global Pol. Studies

Vienna, 20 MAY 2012


contact: anis@bajrektarevic.eu

Comments in Chronological order (0 total comments)

Report Abuse
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
ANNOUNCEMENTS
THE WORLD'S DISCUSSING...
04/29/2016: The feud at India’s central bank More
04/28/2016: Would Brexit cause a global recession? … in 60 Seconds More
04/28/2016: Education and civil society More
04/28/2016: The ACLU's Cynical Attack on Criminal Justice Reform More
04/28/2016: Hutchins Roundup: Housing market, intergenerational transmission of poverty, and more More
04/28/2016: Hutchins Roundup: Housing market, intergenerational transmission of poverty, and more More
04/28/2016: On the soda tax, Clinton and Sanders contradict themselves More
04/28/2016: Food safety in China: Regulatory revisions and consumer confidence More
04/28/2016: Monetary Policies Misunderstood More
04/27/2016: Can you fix the debt? Play 'The Fiscal Ship' at Brookings More
04/27/2016: The refugee crisis: Sugar in a teacup? More
04/27/2016: How we picked the debt goal for The Fiscal Ship More
04/27/2016: How we picked the debt goal for The Fiscal Ship More
04/27/2016: Regional alignment, not competition: How Greater Milwaukee is remaking economic development More
04/27/2016: The 2016 Friedman Prize: Register Now to Attend More
04/27/2016: ISIS in the Pacific: Assessing terrorism in Southeast Asia and the threat to the homeland More
04/27/2016: Ending Welfare as We Know It More
04/27/2016: China’s economy and financial markets: Reforms and risks More
04/27/2016: At Senate budget hearing, a sharp take on the stalled progress More
04/26/2016: Coal economy workers need help—and a carbon tax could provide it More
04/26/2016: Hamster in a wheel: Will the U.N. special session on drugs actually change anything? More
04/26/2016: How to manage the human consequences of Syria’s chaos More
04/26/2016: How to manage the human consequences of Syria’s chaos More
04/26/2016: No, value-added taxes are not bad for small business More
04/26/2016: Is there a path to peace in Yemen? More
04/26/2016: China’s pains over Zimbabwe’s indigenization plan More
04/26/2016: Beyond the American Manufacturing Competitiveness Act: Congress Should Get More Serious about Tariff Reform More
04/26/2016: US Needs No Saudi Arabia More
04/26/2016: China Needs a Foreign Policy That Makes Friends More
04/26/2016: Why we made a computer game about the federal budget More
04/26/2016: Why we made a computer game about the federal budget More
04/26/2016: Bill De Blasio's Blatant Campaign-Finance Hypocrisy More
04/25/2016: China’s overseas investments in Europe and beyond More
04/25/2016: Will Ukraine dash its hopes for Western support? More
04/25/2016: Will Ukraine dash its hopes for Western support? More
04/25/2016: North Korea Threatens Fifth Nuclear Test: U.S. Should Offer to Swap Military Exercises for Nuke Halt More
04/25/2016: Build a better future for coal workers and their communities More
04/25/2016: The security situation in Ethiopia and how it relates to the broader region More
04/25/2016: The U.S. can’t afford to end its global leadership role More
04/25/2016: The U.S. can’t afford to end its global leadership role More
04/25/2016: The U.S. can’t afford to end its global leadership role More
04/25/2016: Saudi Arabia Is a Good Ally? Get Real More
04/25/2016: 5 Ways to Respond If North Korea Tests Another Nuke More
04/25/2016: Risky routes: Energy transit in the Middle East More
04/22/2016: One Year After: Freddie Gray and 'Structural Statism' More
04/22/2016: The U.S. Might Be Better Off Cutting Ties with Saudi Arabia More
04/22/2016: Cross-Strait relations: Not a one-way street More
04/22/2016: The Business of Earth Day More
04/21/2016: Performance measures prove elusive for metro global trade initiatives More
04/21/2016: Will President Trump Fill His Cabinet with Paul Manaforts? More
More...
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2016