Mon. January 26, 2015 Get Published  Get Alerts
HOME  |LOGIN
ABOUT | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US
Frictions in the South China Sea - Chinese strategic mistake

Comments(0)
(Why Indonesia and Japan are pivotal in Asia)


On the eastern, ascendant flank of Eurasian continent, the Chinese vertigo economy is overheated and too-well integrated in the petrodollar system. Beijing, presently, cannot contemplate or afford to allocate any resources in a search for an alternative. (The Sino economy is low-wage- and labor intensive- centered. Chinese revenues are heavily dependent on exports and Chinese reserves are predominantly a mix of the USD and US Treasury bonds.) To sustain itself as a single socio-political and formidably performing economic entity, the People’s Republic requires more energy and less external dependency. Domestically, the demographic-migratory pressures are huge, regional demands are high, and expectations are brewing. Considering its best external energy dependency equalizer (and inner cohesion solidifier), China seems to be turning to its military upgrade rather than towards the resolute alternative energy/Green Tech investments – as it has no time, plan and resources to do both at once. Inattentive of a broader picture, Beijing (probably falsely) believes that lasting containment, especially in the South China Sea, is unbearable, and that – at the same time – fossil-fuels are available (e.g., in Africa and the Gulf), and even cheaper with the help of warships. 1

In effect, the forthcoming Chinese military buildup will only strengthen the existing, and open-up new, bilateral security deals of neighboring countries, primarily with the US – as nowadays in Asia, none wants to be a passive downloader. Ultimately, it may create a politico-military isolation (and financial burden) for China that would just consequently justify and (politically and financially) cheapen the bolder American military presence in Asia-Pacific, especially in the South China Sea. It perfectly adds up to the intensified demonization of China in parts of influential Western media. Hence, the Chinese grab for fossil fuels or its military competition for naval control is not a challenge but rather a boost for the US Asia-Pacific – even an overall – posture. (Managing the contraction of its overseas projection and commitments – some would call it managing the decline of an empire – the US does not fail to note that nowadays half of the world’s merchant tonnage passes though the South China Sea. Therefore, the US will exploit any regional territorial dispute and other frictions to its own security benefit, including the costs sharing of its military presence by the local partners, as to maintain pivotal on the maritime edge of Asia that arches from the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean, Malacca and South China Sea up to the northwest–central Pacific.) A real challenge is always to optimize the (moral political and financial) costs in meeting the national strategic objectives. In this case, it would be a resolute turn of China towards green technology, coupled with the firm buildup of the Asian multilateralism. Without a grand rapprochement to the champions of multilateralism in Asia, which are Indonesia, India and Japan, there is no environment for China to seriously evolve and emerge as a formidable, lasting, and trusted global leader warships .

Opting for either strategic choice will reverberate in the dynamic Asia–Pacific theatre. However, the messages are diametrical: An assertive military – alienates, new technology – attracts neighbors. Finally, armies conquer (and spend) while technology builds (and accumulates)! At this point, any eventual accelerated armament in the Asia-Pacific theatre would only strengthen the hydrocarbon status quo. With its present configuration, it is hard to imagine that anybody can outplay the US in the petro-security, petro-financial and petro-military global playground in the following few decades. Given the planetary petro-financial-tech-military causal constellations, this type of confrontation is so well mastered by and would further only benefit the US and the closest of its allies.

Within the OECD/IEA grouping, or closely; the G-8 (the states with resources, infrastructure, tradition of and know-how to advance the fundamental technological breakthroughs), it is only Japan that may seriously consider a Green/Renewable-tech U-turn. Tokyo’s external energy dependencies are stark and long-lasting. After the recent nuclear trauma, Japan will need a few years to (psychologically and economically) absorb the shock – but it will learn a lesson. For such a huge formidable economy and considerable demography, situated on a small land-mass which is repeatedly brutalized by devastating natural catastrophes (and dependent on yet another disruptive external influence – Arab oil), it might be that a decisive shift towards green energy is the only way to survive, revive, and eventually to emancipate.

An important part of the US–Japan security treaty is the US energy supply lines security guaranty given to (the post-WWII demilitarized) Tokyo. After the recent earthquake-tsunami-radiation armageddon, as well as witnessing the current Chinese military/naval noise, Japan will inevitably rethink and revisit its energy policy, as well as the composition of its primary energy mix.

Tokyo is well aware that the Asian geostrategic myopias are strong and lasting, as many Asian states are either locked up in their narrow regionalisms or/and entrenched in their economic egoisms. Finally, Japan is the only Asian country that has clearly learned from its own modern history, all about the limits of hard power projection and the strong repulsive forces that come in aftermath from the neighbors. Their own pre-modern and modern history does not offer a similar experience to other two Asian heavyweights, China and India. That indicates the Far East as a probable zone of the Green-tech excellence and a place of attraction for many Asians in the decade to come.


1 More on the pan-Asian architectures in my 2011 work: “Preventive diplomacy: No Asian century…”



Anis H. Bajrektarevic, Geopolitics of Energy Editorial Member

Chairperson for Intl. Law & Global Pol. Studies

Vienna, 20 MAY 2012


contact: anis@bajrektarevic.eu

Comments in Chronological order (0 total comments)

Report Abuse
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
International Affairs
Forum - (2014 Issue 1)

Available Now
ANNOUNCEMENTS
THE WORLD'S DISCUSSING...
04/15/2015: Galina Starovoitova Fellowship on Human Rights and Conflict Resolution 2015-16 More
01/26/2015: Inequality in a Lower Growth Latin America More
01/26/2015: Dynamic Scoring: Now What? More
01/23/2015: China Chart of the Week: China’s Real Effective FX Appreciation in Perspective More
01/23/2015: Connecting Histories: Decolonization and the Cold War in Southeast Asia, 1945–1962 More
01/23/2015: The Year Ahead in Environment and Energy More
01/23/2015: Citizen Security in Mexico: Getting Better or Getting Worse? More
01/23/2015: Making Sense of the Uproar Over Obama’s 529 Proposal More
01/23/2015: Africa in the News: Zambia Votes, the DRC Amends Controversial Bill amid Protests, and the IMF and World Bank Predict Stable Growth for Africa in 2015-2016 More
01/23/2015: Saudi Arabia: New Leader, Same Medieval State More
01/23/2015: Saudi King Abdullah: An Assessment More
01/23/2015: Fix the Link to Pakistan, Bond With India More
01/23/2015: Obama in India: 4 Reasons to Keep Expectations in Check More
01/23/2015: Renewed U.S.-Cuba Talks Spotlight Future Migration Issues More
01/23/2015: At Risk of Fragmenting, Yemen Poses Dangers to U.S. More
01/23/2015: Greek Elections: Just the Beginning of More Turmoil for the Eurozone More
01/23/2015: Greek Elections: Just the Beginning of More Turmoil for the Eurozone More
01/23/2015: The Next King of the Saudis: Salman, the Family Sheriff More
01/23/2015: Five Bad Options for Gaza More
01/23/2015: Washington and the World According to Mac Thornberry More
01/23/2015: America's Frightening "Policing for Profit" Nightmare More
01/23/2015: Taking Stock of Transition: Enduring Lessons 25 Years Later More
01/23/2015: Taking Stock of Transition: Enduring Lessons 25 Years Later More
01/23/2015: Corporate Inversions and Tax Policy More
01/23/2015: Saving Europe (New and Expanded Edition) : Anatomy of a Dream More
01/22/2015: Poland's War on Radio Free Europe More
01/22/2015: Turkey’s Troubled Democracy and Foreign Policy More
01/22/2015: Clearing the Air: Is Natural Gas a Game Changer for Coal in China? More
01/22/2015: A Growth Slowdown in China? More
01/22/2015: Indian Prime Minister Modi to Welcome Obama for Second Time More
01/22/2015: Israeli Elections: Who Will Win? (The Numbers, Take 1) More
01/22/2015: Innovations in Citizen Security in Ecuador More
01/22/2015: Testimony: Job Creation and a Healthy Economy [pdf] More
01/22/2015: Dynamic Scoring: An Annotated Bibliography More
01/22/2015: A New Kind of Terrorist More
01/22/2015: Barack Obama Recognizes India’s Increasingly Pivotal Geopolitical Role More
01/22/2015: A New Kind of Terrorist More
01/22/2015: Barack Obama Recognizes India’s Increasingly Pivotal Geopolitical Role More
01/22/2015: How Long Will the Global Oil Glut Last? More
01/22/2015: Previewing President Obama’s Trip to India More
01/22/2015: If You Like Higher Prices, Enriched Cronies, and Weak National Security, Then You’ll Love the Jones Act More
01/22/2015: U.S. Should Stay Out of the Russo-Ukrainian Quarrel: Why the Conflict in Ukraine Isn't America's Business, Part I More
01/22/2015: Fix Pensions with 'Buyback' More
01/22/2015: The Hidden Costs of Monetary Mischief More
01/22/2015: Central Banking After the Financial Crisis More
01/22/2015: Taking Down the (Entry) Barriers to Digital Financial Inclusion More
01/22/2015: Empowering Pakistan’s Civil Society to Counter Global Violent Extremism More
01/21/2015: Security Challenges in Europe in 2015 More
01/21/2015: A Conversation with Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson More
01/21/2015: Book Talk: "US Foreign Policy and Defense Strategy: Evolution of an Incidental Superpower" More
More...
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2015