Sat. July 04, 2015 Get Published  Get Alerts
HOME  |LOGIN
ABOUT | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US
Frictions in the South China Sea - Chinese strategic mistake

Comments(0)
(Why Indonesia and Japan are pivotal in Asia)


On the eastern, ascendant flank of Eurasian continent, the Chinese vertigo economy is overheated and too-well integrated in the petrodollar system. Beijing, presently, cannot contemplate or afford to allocate any resources in a search for an alternative. (The Sino economy is low-wage- and labor intensive- centered. Chinese revenues are heavily dependent on exports and Chinese reserves are predominantly a mix of the USD and US Treasury bonds.) To sustain itself as a single socio-political and formidably performing economic entity, the People’s Republic requires more energy and less external dependency. Domestically, the demographic-migratory pressures are huge, regional demands are high, and expectations are brewing. Considering its best external energy dependency equalizer (and inner cohesion solidifier), China seems to be turning to its military upgrade rather than towards the resolute alternative energy/Green Tech investments – as it has no time, plan and resources to do both at once. Inattentive of a broader picture, Beijing (probably falsely) believes that lasting containment, especially in the South China Sea, is unbearable, and that – at the same time – fossil-fuels are available (e.g., in Africa and the Gulf), and even cheaper with the help of warships. 1

In effect, the forthcoming Chinese military buildup will only strengthen the existing, and open-up new, bilateral security deals of neighboring countries, primarily with the US – as nowadays in Asia, none wants to be a passive downloader. Ultimately, it may create a politico-military isolation (and financial burden) for China that would just consequently justify and (politically and financially) cheapen the bolder American military presence in Asia-Pacific, especially in the South China Sea. It perfectly adds up to the intensified demonization of China in parts of influential Western media. Hence, the Chinese grab for fossil fuels or its military competition for naval control is not a challenge but rather a boost for the US Asia-Pacific – even an overall – posture. (Managing the contraction of its overseas projection and commitments – some would call it managing the decline of an empire – the US does not fail to note that nowadays half of the world’s merchant tonnage passes though the South China Sea. Therefore, the US will exploit any regional territorial dispute and other frictions to its own security benefit, including the costs sharing of its military presence by the local partners, as to maintain pivotal on the maritime edge of Asia that arches from the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean, Malacca and South China Sea up to the northwest–central Pacific.) A real challenge is always to optimize the (moral political and financial) costs in meeting the national strategic objectives. In this case, it would be a resolute turn of China towards green technology, coupled with the firm buildup of the Asian multilateralism. Without a grand rapprochement to the champions of multilateralism in Asia, which are Indonesia, India and Japan, there is no environment for China to seriously evolve and emerge as a formidable, lasting, and trusted global leader warships .

Opting for either strategic choice will reverberate in the dynamic Asia–Pacific theatre. However, the messages are diametrical: An assertive military – alienates, new technology – attracts neighbors. Finally, armies conquer (and spend) while technology builds (and accumulates)! At this point, any eventual accelerated armament in the Asia-Pacific theatre would only strengthen the hydrocarbon status quo. With its present configuration, it is hard to imagine that anybody can outplay the US in the petro-security, petro-financial and petro-military global playground in the following few decades. Given the planetary petro-financial-tech-military causal constellations, this type of confrontation is so well mastered by and would further only benefit the US and the closest of its allies.

Within the OECD/IEA grouping, or closely; the G-8 (the states with resources, infrastructure, tradition of and know-how to advance the fundamental technological breakthroughs), it is only Japan that may seriously consider a Green/Renewable-tech U-turn. Tokyo’s external energy dependencies are stark and long-lasting. After the recent nuclear trauma, Japan will need a few years to (psychologically and economically) absorb the shock – but it will learn a lesson. For such a huge formidable economy and considerable demography, situated on a small land-mass which is repeatedly brutalized by devastating natural catastrophes (and dependent on yet another disruptive external influence – Arab oil), it might be that a decisive shift towards green energy is the only way to survive, revive, and eventually to emancipate.

An important part of the US–Japan security treaty is the US energy supply lines security guaranty given to (the post-WWII demilitarized) Tokyo. After the recent earthquake-tsunami-radiation armageddon, as well as witnessing the current Chinese military/naval noise, Japan will inevitably rethink and revisit its energy policy, as well as the composition of its primary energy mix.

Tokyo is well aware that the Asian geostrategic myopias are strong and lasting, as many Asian states are either locked up in their narrow regionalisms or/and entrenched in their economic egoisms. Finally, Japan is the only Asian country that has clearly learned from its own modern history, all about the limits of hard power projection and the strong repulsive forces that come in aftermath from the neighbors. Their own pre-modern and modern history does not offer a similar experience to other two Asian heavyweights, China and India. That indicates the Far East as a probable zone of the Green-tech excellence and a place of attraction for many Asians in the decade to come.


1 More on the pan-Asian architectures in my 2011 work: “Preventive diplomacy: No Asian century…”



Anis H. Bajrektarevic, Geopolitics of Energy Editorial Member

Chairperson for Intl. Law & Global Pol. Studies

Vienna, 20 MAY 2012


contact: anis@bajrektarevic.eu

Comments in Chronological order (0 total comments)

Report Abuse
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
ANNOUNCEMENTS
THE WORLD'S DISCUSSING...
07/15/2015: The Right IDEA: Engaging Decisionmakers on Family Planning in the Post-2015 World More
07/14/2015: Restoring Hope and Dignity: New Developments and Best Practices in Addressing Maternal Morbidities More
07/02/2015: Work! (But not too much) More
07/02/2015: Kennan Cable No.10: A Strategy for Economic Assistance to Ukraine More
07/02/2015: Will the Supreme Court Save America from the 'Greek Disease?' More
07/02/2015: A Political and Intellectual Proxy War over Greece More
07/02/2015: Henri Barkey New Middle East Program Director at Wilson Center More
07/02/2015: Jordan and the Challenges of Confronting ISIS Next Door More
07/02/2015: Washington's Role in Puerto Rico's Mess More
07/02/2015: Extreme Inequality in Mexico More
07/02/2015: What we’ve learned from Brookings experts about the recent SCOTUS decisions More
07/02/2015: Greece Defaults: What Happens Next? More
07/02/2015: Greece?s Future Is in Greek Hands More
07/02/2015: Hutchins Roundup: Credit constraints, Fed projections, and more More
07/02/2015: Hutchins Roundup: Credit constraints, Fed projections, and more More
07/02/2015: How much does it cost to fall ill? More
07/02/2015: The Other Danger of a 'Grexit' More
07/01/2015: Can the Grexit Lemon Be Made into Lemonade? More
07/01/2015: Roger-Mark De Souza on Resilience and the UN Climate Talks More
07/01/2015: The Iran Negotiations: Is this Really the End Game? More
07/01/2015: Congressional Testimony: U.S.-China Educational Relations and Academic Freedom More
07/01/2015: The Export-Import Bank’s authorization expired: What does this mean for Africa? More
07/01/2015: The Uneasy Case for a Financial Transaction Tax More
07/01/2015: Gains from Harmonizing US and EU Auto Regulations under the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership More
07/01/2015: Event: Gains from Harmonizing US and EU Auto Regulations under the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership More
07/01/2015: Sovereign Bond Purchases and Risk Sharing Arrangements: Implications for Euro Area Monetary Policy [pdf] More
07/01/2015: China’s foreign aid reform and implications for Africa More
07/01/2015: Can Europe be reborn from past errors? More
07/01/2015: Experts weigh in (part 4): Can the United States counter ISIS propaganda? More
07/01/2015: Republicans Amid Changing Opinions on Social Issues More
07/01/2015: It's Time for the Blaine Amendment to Go More
07/01/2015: Toss South Korea off America's Defense Dole: Presidents Obama and Park Should End Military Welfare More
07/01/2015: Comment investissent les entreprises d’Etat chinoises More
07/01/2015: Comment investissent les entreprises d’Etat chinoises More
06/30/2015: Latin American Energy: Issues and Prospects More
06/30/2015: Ship of Miracles: Korea 1950 More
06/30/2015: Finding Its Way to the West? Ukraine and Its Challenges More
06/30/2015: Iran and Syria: The End of the Road? More
06/30/2015: Infographic: Water Scarcity and Energy Development in Northern Mexico More
06/30/2015: Inequality in Mexico More
06/30/2015: Powerless in Pakistan More
06/30/2015: Greece and Europe Belong Together More
06/30/2015: MENA Women's News Brief More
06/30/2015: Infographic: Citizen Security in Michoacán More
06/30/2015: Can the U.S. Get a Good Iran Deal? More
06/30/2015: Crisis in the Eurozone More
06/30/2015: Government Debt: Jefferson and Gallatin Were Right More
06/30/2015: Greece: A view from the battleground More
06/30/2015: Video: Turbulent Outlook for Greece More
06/30/2015: Six key issues the US-Brazil climate change announcement could have addressed, but didn’t More
More...
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2015