Thu. September 03, 2015 Get Published  Get Alerts
HOME  |LOGIN
ABOUT | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US
Frictions in the South China Sea - Chinese strategic mistake

Comments(0)
(Why Indonesia and Japan are pivotal in Asia)


On the eastern, ascendant flank of Eurasian continent, the Chinese vertigo economy is overheated and too-well integrated in the petrodollar system. Beijing, presently, cannot contemplate or afford to allocate any resources in a search for an alternative. (The Sino economy is low-wage- and labor intensive- centered. Chinese revenues are heavily dependent on exports and Chinese reserves are predominantly a mix of the USD and US Treasury bonds.) To sustain itself as a single socio-political and formidably performing economic entity, the People’s Republic requires more energy and less external dependency. Domestically, the demographic-migratory pressures are huge, regional demands are high, and expectations are brewing. Considering its best external energy dependency equalizer (and inner cohesion solidifier), China seems to be turning to its military upgrade rather than towards the resolute alternative energy/Green Tech investments – as it has no time, plan and resources to do both at once. Inattentive of a broader picture, Beijing (probably falsely) believes that lasting containment, especially in the South China Sea, is unbearable, and that – at the same time – fossil-fuels are available (e.g., in Africa and the Gulf), and even cheaper with the help of warships. 1

In effect, the forthcoming Chinese military buildup will only strengthen the existing, and open-up new, bilateral security deals of neighboring countries, primarily with the US – as nowadays in Asia, none wants to be a passive downloader. Ultimately, it may create a politico-military isolation (and financial burden) for China that would just consequently justify and (politically and financially) cheapen the bolder American military presence in Asia-Pacific, especially in the South China Sea. It perfectly adds up to the intensified demonization of China in parts of influential Western media. Hence, the Chinese grab for fossil fuels or its military competition for naval control is not a challenge but rather a boost for the US Asia-Pacific – even an overall – posture. (Managing the contraction of its overseas projection and commitments – some would call it managing the decline of an empire – the US does not fail to note that nowadays half of the world’s merchant tonnage passes though the South China Sea. Therefore, the US will exploit any regional territorial dispute and other frictions to its own security benefit, including the costs sharing of its military presence by the local partners, as to maintain pivotal on the maritime edge of Asia that arches from the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean, Malacca and South China Sea up to the northwest–central Pacific.) A real challenge is always to optimize the (moral political and financial) costs in meeting the national strategic objectives. In this case, it would be a resolute turn of China towards green technology, coupled with the firm buildup of the Asian multilateralism. Without a grand rapprochement to the champions of multilateralism in Asia, which are Indonesia, India and Japan, there is no environment for China to seriously evolve and emerge as a formidable, lasting, and trusted global leader warships .

Opting for either strategic choice will reverberate in the dynamic Asia–Pacific theatre. However, the messages are diametrical: An assertive military – alienates, new technology – attracts neighbors. Finally, armies conquer (and spend) while technology builds (and accumulates)! At this point, any eventual accelerated armament in the Asia-Pacific theatre would only strengthen the hydrocarbon status quo. With its present configuration, it is hard to imagine that anybody can outplay the US in the petro-security, petro-financial and petro-military global playground in the following few decades. Given the planetary petro-financial-tech-military causal constellations, this type of confrontation is so well mastered by and would further only benefit the US and the closest of its allies.

Within the OECD/IEA grouping, or closely; the G-8 (the states with resources, infrastructure, tradition of and know-how to advance the fundamental technological breakthroughs), it is only Japan that may seriously consider a Green/Renewable-tech U-turn. Tokyo’s external energy dependencies are stark and long-lasting. After the recent nuclear trauma, Japan will need a few years to (psychologically and economically) absorb the shock – but it will learn a lesson. For such a huge formidable economy and considerable demography, situated on a small land-mass which is repeatedly brutalized by devastating natural catastrophes (and dependent on yet another disruptive external influence – Arab oil), it might be that a decisive shift towards green energy is the only way to survive, revive, and eventually to emancipate.

An important part of the US–Japan security treaty is the US energy supply lines security guaranty given to (the post-WWII demilitarized) Tokyo. After the recent earthquake-tsunami-radiation armageddon, as well as witnessing the current Chinese military/naval noise, Japan will inevitably rethink and revisit its energy policy, as well as the composition of its primary energy mix.

Tokyo is well aware that the Asian geostrategic myopias are strong and lasting, as many Asian states are either locked up in their narrow regionalisms or/and entrenched in their economic egoisms. Finally, Japan is the only Asian country that has clearly learned from its own modern history, all about the limits of hard power projection and the strong repulsive forces that come in aftermath from the neighbors. Their own pre-modern and modern history does not offer a similar experience to other two Asian heavyweights, China and India. That indicates the Far East as a probable zone of the Green-tech excellence and a place of attraction for many Asians in the decade to come.


1 More on the pan-Asian architectures in my 2011 work: “Preventive diplomacy: No Asian century…”



Anis H. Bajrektarevic, Geopolitics of Energy Editorial Member

Chairperson for Intl. Law & Global Pol. Studies

Vienna, 20 MAY 2012


contact: anis@bajrektarevic.eu

Comments in Chronological order (0 total comments)

Report Abuse
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
ANNOUNCEMENTS
THE WORLD'S DISCUSSING...
09/03/2015: What happens when the Fed raises interest rates? More
09/02/2015: To comply with the Clean Power Plan, states should tax carbon More
09/02/2015: Wednesday evening links More
09/02/2015: Schumpeterian creative destruction — the rise of Uber and the great taxicab collapse More
09/02/2015: Pomp and circumstance in Beijing: The Chinese military flexes its muscles More
09/02/2015: Thanks to Libya, North Korea Might Never Negotiate on Nuclear Weapons More
09/02/2015: Policy Brief 15-14: Reshoring by US Firms: What Do the Data Say? [pdf] More
09/02/2015: Budgetary turmoil at the Department of Defense, 2010-2014 More
09/02/2015: Exciting, Illuminating Book The Words We Live By Makes the Constitution Come Alive More
09/02/2015: The 2016 Friedman Prize: Nomination Process Begins More
09/01/2015: Hopes for Obama's address to the American Jewish community More
09/01/2015: Obama walking a razor’s edge in Alaska on climate change More
09/01/2015: Obama walking a razor’s edge in Alaska on climate change More
09/01/2015: Four questions, and answers, about China’s economy More
09/01/2015: Congress and the Budget: Danger Ahead More
09/01/2015: Protecting the Religious Liberties of the City’s Jewish Schools More
09/01/2015: Thailand Suffers as Military Plans to Extend Control: Junta Delivers Oppression, Not Happiness More
09/01/2015: Putin’s deceptive pause: What are Russia’s next steps in Ukraine? More
09/01/2015: The believer: How an introvert became the leader of the Islamic State More
08/31/2015: Domestic counterterrorism: Material support or bust More
08/31/2015: Domestic counterterrorism: Material support or bust More
08/31/2015: Taking stock of financial and digital inclusion in sub-Saharan Africa More
08/31/2015: Budgetary turmoil at the Department of Defense from 2010 to 2014 More
08/31/2015: Stuffing data gaps with dollars: What will it cost to close the data deficit in poor countries? More
08/31/2015: GOP Candidate Jeb Bush Finds His Inner Neocon More
08/31/2015: Why growth matters in fighting poverty in Bosnia and Herzegovina More
08/31/2015: Politicization of Intelligence: Lessons from a Long, Dishonorable History More
08/31/2015: Emission targets put us in bullseye of climate fight More
08/31/2015: China: The Mishandled Issue in the U.S. Presidential Election Campaign More
08/31/2015: The Resurrection of Discredited Ideas More
08/30/2015: Why Enlisting Turkey to Fight the Islamic State Was a Bad Idea More
08/29/2015: California More of a Welfare State than Most Countries in Europe More
08/29/2015: Waiting for the Fed Rate Rise: Beware Careless Talk More
08/28/2015: Why the Fed Should Postpone Rate Hikes More
08/28/2015: The United States Still Runs the World More
08/28/2015: Here's how America can really make the Iran deal better More
08/28/2015: Which countries are most exposed to China? More
08/28/2015: Six memos on social mobility you ought to have read More
08/28/2015: Africa in the news: AGOA forum held, Zimbabwe asks for international economic support, South Africa fears recession, and South Sudan peace deal signed More
08/28/2015: Africa in the news: AGOA forum held, Zimbabwe asks for international economic support, South Africa fears recession, and South Sudan peace deal signed More
08/28/2015: On Health Care, Walker and Rubio Offer Obamacare Lite More
08/28/2015: Who Lost Greece? Parallels with Russia in 1998 More
08/28/2015: Who Lost Greece? Parallels with Russia in 1998 More
08/28/2015: Who Lost Greece? Parallels with Russia in 1998 More
08/28/2015: Fifty Years after Reform: The Successes, Failures, and the Lessons from the Immigration Act of 1965 More
08/28/2015: Cutting Funding, Opposing Labor Rules, Doesn't Make You 'Anti-Education' More
08/28/2015: How European Welfare Discourages Work More
08/28/2015: Why advocating universal free primary health care is irresponsible at best More
08/27/2015: Correcting the "Historical Accident" of Opt-Out Requirements More
08/27/2015: Russia's Arctic illusions More
More...
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2015