Fri. July 31, 2015 Get Published  Get Alerts
HOME  |LOGIN
ABOUT | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US
Frictions in the South China Sea - Chinese strategic mistake

Comments(0)
(Why Indonesia and Japan are pivotal in Asia)


On the eastern, ascendant flank of Eurasian continent, the Chinese vertigo economy is overheated and too-well integrated in the petrodollar system. Beijing, presently, cannot contemplate or afford to allocate any resources in a search for an alternative. (The Sino economy is low-wage- and labor intensive- centered. Chinese revenues are heavily dependent on exports and Chinese reserves are predominantly a mix of the USD and US Treasury bonds.) To sustain itself as a single socio-political and formidably performing economic entity, the People’s Republic requires more energy and less external dependency. Domestically, the demographic-migratory pressures are huge, regional demands are high, and expectations are brewing. Considering its best external energy dependency equalizer (and inner cohesion solidifier), China seems to be turning to its military upgrade rather than towards the resolute alternative energy/Green Tech investments – as it has no time, plan and resources to do both at once. Inattentive of a broader picture, Beijing (probably falsely) believes that lasting containment, especially in the South China Sea, is unbearable, and that – at the same time – fossil-fuels are available (e.g., in Africa and the Gulf), and even cheaper with the help of warships. 1

In effect, the forthcoming Chinese military buildup will only strengthen the existing, and open-up new, bilateral security deals of neighboring countries, primarily with the US – as nowadays in Asia, none wants to be a passive downloader. Ultimately, it may create a politico-military isolation (and financial burden) for China that would just consequently justify and (politically and financially) cheapen the bolder American military presence in Asia-Pacific, especially in the South China Sea. It perfectly adds up to the intensified demonization of China in parts of influential Western media. Hence, the Chinese grab for fossil fuels or its military competition for naval control is not a challenge but rather a boost for the US Asia-Pacific – even an overall – posture. (Managing the contraction of its overseas projection and commitments – some would call it managing the decline of an empire – the US does not fail to note that nowadays half of the world’s merchant tonnage passes though the South China Sea. Therefore, the US will exploit any regional territorial dispute and other frictions to its own security benefit, including the costs sharing of its military presence by the local partners, as to maintain pivotal on the maritime edge of Asia that arches from the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean, Malacca and South China Sea up to the northwest–central Pacific.) A real challenge is always to optimize the (moral political and financial) costs in meeting the national strategic objectives. In this case, it would be a resolute turn of China towards green technology, coupled with the firm buildup of the Asian multilateralism. Without a grand rapprochement to the champions of multilateralism in Asia, which are Indonesia, India and Japan, there is no environment for China to seriously evolve and emerge as a formidable, lasting, and trusted global leader warships .

Opting for either strategic choice will reverberate in the dynamic Asia–Pacific theatre. However, the messages are diametrical: An assertive military – alienates, new technology – attracts neighbors. Finally, armies conquer (and spend) while technology builds (and accumulates)! At this point, any eventual accelerated armament in the Asia-Pacific theatre would only strengthen the hydrocarbon status quo. With its present configuration, it is hard to imagine that anybody can outplay the US in the petro-security, petro-financial and petro-military global playground in the following few decades. Given the planetary petro-financial-tech-military causal constellations, this type of confrontation is so well mastered by and would further only benefit the US and the closest of its allies.

Within the OECD/IEA grouping, or closely; the G-8 (the states with resources, infrastructure, tradition of and know-how to advance the fundamental technological breakthroughs), it is only Japan that may seriously consider a Green/Renewable-tech U-turn. Tokyo’s external energy dependencies are stark and long-lasting. After the recent nuclear trauma, Japan will need a few years to (psychologically and economically) absorb the shock – but it will learn a lesson. For such a huge formidable economy and considerable demography, situated on a small land-mass which is repeatedly brutalized by devastating natural catastrophes (and dependent on yet another disruptive external influence – Arab oil), it might be that a decisive shift towards green energy is the only way to survive, revive, and eventually to emancipate.

An important part of the US–Japan security treaty is the US energy supply lines security guaranty given to (the post-WWII demilitarized) Tokyo. After the recent earthquake-tsunami-radiation armageddon, as well as witnessing the current Chinese military/naval noise, Japan will inevitably rethink and revisit its energy policy, as well as the composition of its primary energy mix.

Tokyo is well aware that the Asian geostrategic myopias are strong and lasting, as many Asian states are either locked up in their narrow regionalisms or/and entrenched in their economic egoisms. Finally, Japan is the only Asian country that has clearly learned from its own modern history, all about the limits of hard power projection and the strong repulsive forces that come in aftermath from the neighbors. Their own pre-modern and modern history does not offer a similar experience to other two Asian heavyweights, China and India. That indicates the Far East as a probable zone of the Green-tech excellence and a place of attraction for many Asians in the decade to come.


1 More on the pan-Asian architectures in my 2011 work: “Preventive diplomacy: No Asian century…”



Anis H. Bajrektarevic, Geopolitics of Energy Editorial Member

Chairperson for Intl. Law & Global Pol. Studies

Vienna, 20 MAY 2012


contact: anis@bajrektarevic.eu

Comments in Chronological order (0 total comments)

Report Abuse
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
ANNOUNCEMENTS
THE WORLD'S DISCUSSING...
07/31/2015: Remembering Milton Friedman More
07/30/2015: Medicare at 50: Did it solve the right problems without creating new ones? More
07/30/2015: Russia's National Idea: Matthew Rojansky interviews Dr. Nikolai Zlobin More
07/30/2015: China's National Idea: Robert Daly interviews Dr. Ho-fung Hung More
07/30/2015: 5 questions every presidential candidate should answer: China’s military occupation of the South China Sea edition More
07/30/2015: Did You Know: Mexican Migration More
07/30/2015: Getting past the emotions around Cecil the Lion: Hard truths about conservation and trophy hunting More
07/30/2015: Debate: The Case for Growth More
07/30/2015: Greece: Strophe and Antistrophe More
07/30/2015: Walter Palmer Alone Is Not to Blame for Cecil the Lion's Death More
07/30/2015: Hard lessons from creating jobs and opportunity in the next economy More
07/30/2015: An 'ISIS-free Zone' Is Nothing but a Road to US Mission Creep More
07/30/2015: Hutchins Roundup: Public investment and elections, impact of interest rate changes, and more More
07/30/2015: Hutchins Roundup: Public investment and elections, impact of interest rate changes, and more More
07/30/2015: Does the developing world need a welfare state to eliminate poverty? Some insights from history More
07/30/2015: The IMF Experts Flunk, Again More
07/30/2015: Turkey joins the fight against the Islamic State More
07/30/2015: Bruce Jones named vice president and director of Foreign Policy at Brookings More
07/29/2015: Taliban Leader Mullah Omar’s Death Confirmed More
07/29/2015: MENA Women's News Brief More
07/29/2015: The Iran Nuclear Deal: The View from the Region More
07/29/2015: The Best Argument against Immigration More
07/29/2015: What’s Behind Turkey’s U-Turn on the Islamic State? More
07/29/2015: Why China goes to Europe More
07/29/2015: Why China goes to Europe More
07/29/2015: Why China goes to Europe More
07/29/2015: Sanctions on Iran: Why They Worked and Why a 'Snapback' May Not Work More
07/29/2015: Sanctions on Iran: Why They Worked and Why a 'Snapback' May Not Work More
07/29/2015: The lion that roared: Israel and the Iran deal More
07/29/2015: How Piketty Misses the Point More
07/29/2015: Register for Turkey's New Role in the Fight Against ISIS: Game Changer? More
07/29/2015: The Role of Bankruptcy Reform in Addressing Too Big To Fail [pdf] More
07/29/2015: King v. Burwell Expanded Obamacare Even More than You Know More
07/29/2015: Demonizing Foreign Investors for the Sins of U.S. Tax Policy Is as Dangerous as It Is Absurd More
07/29/2015: States adopt and adapt the EITC to address local need More
07/29/2015: Taking Voter Equality Seriously More
07/29/2015: Wanted: Small-Government Republicans More
07/29/2015: Legislative Cyber Threats: CISA's Not the Only One More
07/29/2015: China's conflicting signals on the South China Sea More
07/28/2015: Climate Change Adaptation and Population Dynamics in Latin America and the Caribbean: Key Issues for Policy Makers More
07/28/2015: Infographic: A History of Immigration Policy and Migration Flows More
07/28/2015: Teleconference: Obama in Africa More
07/28/2015: Advancing Justice Sector Reform in Mexico – An Expert Take More
07/28/2015: Will Greece Make It After All? More
07/28/2015: Don't close U.S. bases overseas More
07/28/2015: Putin Paranoia: Over-Imaginative U.S. and NATO Fear Russian Aggression Aided by Greek Fifth Column More
07/28/2015: Millennials Will be Worse off Thanks to New York's $15 Minimum Wage Hike More
07/28/2015: Why the TPP is the linchpin of the Asia rebalance More
07/27/2015: Does the ADA give the US moral legitimacy as a global disability rights leader?: The view from Russia and Ukraine More
07/27/2015: How to Secure a Competitive U.S. Economy More
More...
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2015