Fri. April 17, 2015 Get Published  Get Alerts
Frictions in the South China Sea - Chinese strategic mistake

(Why Indonesia and Japan are pivotal in Asia)

On the eastern, ascendant flank of Eurasian continent, the Chinese vertigo economy is overheated and too-well integrated in the petrodollar system. Beijing, presently, cannot contemplate or afford to allocate any resources in a search for an alternative. (The Sino economy is low-wage- and labor intensive- centered. Chinese revenues are heavily dependent on exports and Chinese reserves are predominantly a mix of the USD and US Treasury bonds.) To sustain itself as a single socio-political and formidably performing economic entity, the People’s Republic requires more energy and less external dependency. Domestically, the demographic-migratory pressures are huge, regional demands are high, and expectations are brewing. Considering its best external energy dependency equalizer (and inner cohesion solidifier), China seems to be turning to its military upgrade rather than towards the resolute alternative energy/Green Tech investments – as it has no time, plan and resources to do both at once. Inattentive of a broader picture, Beijing (probably falsely) believes that lasting containment, especially in the South China Sea, is unbearable, and that – at the same time – fossil-fuels are available (e.g., in Africa and the Gulf), and even cheaper with the help of warships. 1

In effect, the forthcoming Chinese military buildup will only strengthen the existing, and open-up new, bilateral security deals of neighboring countries, primarily with the US – as nowadays in Asia, none wants to be a passive downloader. Ultimately, it may create a politico-military isolation (and financial burden) for China that would just consequently justify and (politically and financially) cheapen the bolder American military presence in Asia-Pacific, especially in the South China Sea. It perfectly adds up to the intensified demonization of China in parts of influential Western media. Hence, the Chinese grab for fossil fuels or its military competition for naval control is not a challenge but rather a boost for the US Asia-Pacific – even an overall – posture. (Managing the contraction of its overseas projection and commitments – some would call it managing the decline of an empire – the US does not fail to note that nowadays half of the world’s merchant tonnage passes though the South China Sea. Therefore, the US will exploit any regional territorial dispute and other frictions to its own security benefit, including the costs sharing of its military presence by the local partners, as to maintain pivotal on the maritime edge of Asia that arches from the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean, Malacca and South China Sea up to the northwest–central Pacific.) A real challenge is always to optimize the (moral political and financial) costs in meeting the national strategic objectives. In this case, it would be a resolute turn of China towards green technology, coupled with the firm buildup of the Asian multilateralism. Without a grand rapprochement to the champions of multilateralism in Asia, which are Indonesia, India and Japan, there is no environment for China to seriously evolve and emerge as a formidable, lasting, and trusted global leader warships .

Opting for either strategic choice will reverberate in the dynamic Asia–Pacific theatre. However, the messages are diametrical: An assertive military – alienates, new technology – attracts neighbors. Finally, armies conquer (and spend) while technology builds (and accumulates)! At this point, any eventual accelerated armament in the Asia-Pacific theatre would only strengthen the hydrocarbon status quo. With its present configuration, it is hard to imagine that anybody can outplay the US in the petro-security, petro-financial and petro-military global playground in the following few decades. Given the planetary petro-financial-tech-military causal constellations, this type of confrontation is so well mastered by and would further only benefit the US and the closest of its allies.

Within the OECD/IEA grouping, or closely; the G-8 (the states with resources, infrastructure, tradition of and know-how to advance the fundamental technological breakthroughs), it is only Japan that may seriously consider a Green/Renewable-tech U-turn. Tokyo’s external energy dependencies are stark and long-lasting. After the recent nuclear trauma, Japan will need a few years to (psychologically and economically) absorb the shock – but it will learn a lesson. For such a huge formidable economy and considerable demography, situated on a small land-mass which is repeatedly brutalized by devastating natural catastrophes (and dependent on yet another disruptive external influence – Arab oil), it might be that a decisive shift towards green energy is the only way to survive, revive, and eventually to emancipate.

An important part of the US–Japan security treaty is the US energy supply lines security guaranty given to (the post-WWII demilitarized) Tokyo. After the recent earthquake-tsunami-radiation armageddon, as well as witnessing the current Chinese military/naval noise, Japan will inevitably rethink and revisit its energy policy, as well as the composition of its primary energy mix.

Tokyo is well aware that the Asian geostrategic myopias are strong and lasting, as many Asian states are either locked up in their narrow regionalisms or/and entrenched in their economic egoisms. Finally, Japan is the only Asian country that has clearly learned from its own modern history, all about the limits of hard power projection and the strong repulsive forces that come in aftermath from the neighbors. Their own pre-modern and modern history does not offer a similar experience to other two Asian heavyweights, China and India. That indicates the Far East as a probable zone of the Green-tech excellence and a place of attraction for many Asians in the decade to come.

1 More on the pan-Asian architectures in my 2011 work: “Preventive diplomacy: No Asian century…”

Anis H. Bajrektarevic, Geopolitics of Energy Editorial Member

Chairperson for Intl. Law & Global Pol. Studies

Vienna, 20 MAY 2012


Comments in Chronological order (0 total comments)

Report Abuse
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
International Affairs
Forum - (2014 Issue 1)

Available Now
04/30/2015: Media Briefing: Summit of the Americas More
04/30/2015: Promoting Peace and Prosperity in Honduras: A Conversation with His Excellency Juan Orlando Hernández, President of the Republic of Honduras More
04/24/2015: Fiscal Policy in Latin America: Lessons and Legacies of the Global Financial Crisis More
04/21/2015: Does Russian Nationalism have a Future after Ukraine? More
04/17/2015: 25 Years Since the Baltic Revolution: Marking Accomplishments, Facing Challenges More
04/17/2015: Arun Jaitley on Tax Reforms in India: Vision for the Future More
04/17/2015: Margrethe Vestager: Agenda for European Competition Policy More
04/16/2015: China and Latin America: Seeking a Path to Sustainable Development More
04/16/2015: Event: Agenda for European Competition Policy More
04/16/2015: Event: Agenda for European Competition Policy More
04/16/2015: Changing composition of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court: New designees More
04/16/2015: World War II is also not over in Asia More
04/16/2015: Real Value of China’s FX Reserves is Essentially Flat More
04/16/2015: Climate Change's False Illusion of Progress More
04/16/2015: Hutchins Roundup: IMF gloomy on growth, higher-ed tax credits questioned, and more More
04/16/2015: Hutchins Roundup: IMF gloomy on growth, higher-ed tax credits questioned, and more More
04/16/2015: The Greek economy and its global partners: A conversation with Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis More
04/16/2015: Where Have All the Arab States Gone? More
04/16/2015: Brazil's Investment: A Maze in One's Own Navel More
04/16/2015: Eurozone at a crossroads (again): A conversation with Wolfgang Schäuble More
04/16/2015: Eurozone at a crossroads (again): A conversation with Wolfgang Schäuble More
04/16/2015: Event: Tax Reforms in India: Vision for the Future More
04/16/2015: Tax Reforms in India: Vision for the Future More
04/16/2015: Global factory: Policy implications from the emergence of global value chains More
04/16/2015: Iraq 2.0: The REAL Reason Hawks Oppose the Iran Deal More
04/16/2015: Leave School Choice to the States More
04/15/2015: Russian Media and Ukraine’s Domestic Politics More
04/15/2015: The U.S.-Mexico Border Economy in Transition: Infographic More
04/15/2015: Klaus Regling: What Lessons Have We Learned from the Euro Crisis? More
04/15/2015: Climate Change & Fragility as a Foreign Policy Priority: A New G7 Report More
04/15/2015: Galina Starovoitova Fellowship on Human Rights and Conflict Resolution 2015-16 More
04/15/2015: China's Foreign Policy in a New Era of Sino-Latin American Relations More
04/15/2015: Financial Education Tools for the Hispanic Community More
04/15/2015: Canada and Future Challenges in the Arctic More
04/15/2015: New Wilson Center-Gramsci Institute Project on the Italian Communist Party and China More
04/15/2015: CfP: Northeast Asia during the Cold War: Security and Development, September 2015 More
04/15/2015: Monetary policy in the future More
04/15/2015: The global economy, financing for development, and Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank are focal points as experts convene for the World Bank-IMF Spring Meetings More
04/15/2015: Is it time to rethink the congressional budget resolution? More
04/15/2015: Tax policies to support low- and middle-income Americans More
04/15/2015: Event: What Lessons Have We Learned from the Euro Crisis? More
04/15/2015: Klaus Regling: What Lessons Have We Learned from the Euro Crisis? More
04/15/2015: Certain U.S. Abortions Tear The Fetus Apart, ISIS-Style More
04/15/2015: The Best Foreign-Policy Approach for America Is... More
04/15/2015: Special Courts for Foreign Investors More
04/15/2015: Getting Welfare Reform Right More
04/15/2015: A new Americas: Taking Cuba off the U.S. terrorism list More
04/15/2015: We Should Get to Decide How the Government Spends our Taxes More
04/15/2015: A Really Bad Idea: A 'Limited' War with Iran More
04/15/2015: Will North Korea choose to stay out in the cold? More
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2015