Sun. March 29, 2015 Get Published  Get Alerts
HOME  |LOGIN
ABOUT | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US
Frictions in the South China Sea - Chinese strategic mistake

Comments(0)
(Why Indonesia and Japan are pivotal in Asia)


On the eastern, ascendant flank of Eurasian continent, the Chinese vertigo economy is overheated and too-well integrated in the petrodollar system. Beijing, presently, cannot contemplate or afford to allocate any resources in a search for an alternative. (The Sino economy is low-wage- and labor intensive- centered. Chinese revenues are heavily dependent on exports and Chinese reserves are predominantly a mix of the USD and US Treasury bonds.) To sustain itself as a single socio-political and formidably performing economic entity, the People’s Republic requires more energy and less external dependency. Domestically, the demographic-migratory pressures are huge, regional demands are high, and expectations are brewing. Considering its best external energy dependency equalizer (and inner cohesion solidifier), China seems to be turning to its military upgrade rather than towards the resolute alternative energy/Green Tech investments – as it has no time, plan and resources to do both at once. Inattentive of a broader picture, Beijing (probably falsely) believes that lasting containment, especially in the South China Sea, is unbearable, and that – at the same time – fossil-fuels are available (e.g., in Africa and the Gulf), and even cheaper with the help of warships. 1

In effect, the forthcoming Chinese military buildup will only strengthen the existing, and open-up new, bilateral security deals of neighboring countries, primarily with the US – as nowadays in Asia, none wants to be a passive downloader. Ultimately, it may create a politico-military isolation (and financial burden) for China that would just consequently justify and (politically and financially) cheapen the bolder American military presence in Asia-Pacific, especially in the South China Sea. It perfectly adds up to the intensified demonization of China in parts of influential Western media. Hence, the Chinese grab for fossil fuels or its military competition for naval control is not a challenge but rather a boost for the US Asia-Pacific – even an overall – posture. (Managing the contraction of its overseas projection and commitments – some would call it managing the decline of an empire – the US does not fail to note that nowadays half of the world’s merchant tonnage passes though the South China Sea. Therefore, the US will exploit any regional territorial dispute and other frictions to its own security benefit, including the costs sharing of its military presence by the local partners, as to maintain pivotal on the maritime edge of Asia that arches from the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean, Malacca and South China Sea up to the northwest–central Pacific.) A real challenge is always to optimize the (moral political and financial) costs in meeting the national strategic objectives. In this case, it would be a resolute turn of China towards green technology, coupled with the firm buildup of the Asian multilateralism. Without a grand rapprochement to the champions of multilateralism in Asia, which are Indonesia, India and Japan, there is no environment for China to seriously evolve and emerge as a formidable, lasting, and trusted global leader warships .

Opting for either strategic choice will reverberate in the dynamic Asia–Pacific theatre. However, the messages are diametrical: An assertive military – alienates, new technology – attracts neighbors. Finally, armies conquer (and spend) while technology builds (and accumulates)! At this point, any eventual accelerated armament in the Asia-Pacific theatre would only strengthen the hydrocarbon status quo. With its present configuration, it is hard to imagine that anybody can outplay the US in the petro-security, petro-financial and petro-military global playground in the following few decades. Given the planetary petro-financial-tech-military causal constellations, this type of confrontation is so well mastered by and would further only benefit the US and the closest of its allies.

Within the OECD/IEA grouping, or closely; the G-8 (the states with resources, infrastructure, tradition of and know-how to advance the fundamental technological breakthroughs), it is only Japan that may seriously consider a Green/Renewable-tech U-turn. Tokyo’s external energy dependencies are stark and long-lasting. After the recent nuclear trauma, Japan will need a few years to (psychologically and economically) absorb the shock – but it will learn a lesson. For such a huge formidable economy and considerable demography, situated on a small land-mass which is repeatedly brutalized by devastating natural catastrophes (and dependent on yet another disruptive external influence – Arab oil), it might be that a decisive shift towards green energy is the only way to survive, revive, and eventually to emancipate.

An important part of the US–Japan security treaty is the US energy supply lines security guaranty given to (the post-WWII demilitarized) Tokyo. After the recent earthquake-tsunami-radiation armageddon, as well as witnessing the current Chinese military/naval noise, Japan will inevitably rethink and revisit its energy policy, as well as the composition of its primary energy mix.

Tokyo is well aware that the Asian geostrategic myopias are strong and lasting, as many Asian states are either locked up in their narrow regionalisms or/and entrenched in their economic egoisms. Finally, Japan is the only Asian country that has clearly learned from its own modern history, all about the limits of hard power projection and the strong repulsive forces that come in aftermath from the neighbors. Their own pre-modern and modern history does not offer a similar experience to other two Asian heavyweights, China and India. That indicates the Far East as a probable zone of the Green-tech excellence and a place of attraction for many Asians in the decade to come.


1 More on the pan-Asian architectures in my 2011 work: “Preventive diplomacy: No Asian century…”



Anis H. Bajrektarevic, Geopolitics of Energy Editorial Member

Chairperson for Intl. Law & Global Pol. Studies

Vienna, 20 MAY 2012


contact: anis@bajrektarevic.eu

Comments in Chronological order (0 total comments)

Report Abuse
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
International Affairs
Forum - (2014 Issue 1)

Available Now
ANNOUNCEMENTS
THE WORLD'S DISCUSSING...
04/15/2015: Galina Starovoitova Fellowship on Human Rights and Conflict Resolution 2015-16 More
04/15/2015: China's Foreign Policy in a New Era of Sino-Latin American Relations More
03/31/2015: South Asia Consultation on Maternal Health: Regional Dialogue and Way Forward More
03/31/2015: Event Summary: Climate Change Adaptation, Urban Planning, and the Private Sector in Colombia More
03/27/2015: Island Communities: Resilience in the Face of Climate Change More
03/27/2015: Throw the Bums Out More
03/27/2015: Increasing Transparency at the IAEA Archives More
03/27/2015: Can the U.S. Have Normal Diplomatic Relations with Cuba? More
03/27/2015: New leadership on climate as Mexico launches its National Contribution for climate deal in Paris More
03/27/2015: New leadership on climate as Mexico launches its National Contribution for climate deal in Paris More
03/27/2015: What does China having the largest GDP mean? More
03/27/2015: Politico Presents …. Washington Lobbyists! More
03/27/2015: Afghanistan Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah lays out clear parameters for future negotiations with Taliban More
03/27/2015: How about Spending Cuts Instead of Sanders's War Tax? More
03/27/2015: What do the China Development Forum, Lee Kuan Yew, and the World Bank have in common? More
03/27/2015: FEMA Tells Oklahoma to Do the Impossible ... Or Else More
03/27/2015: Missile defense and South Korea: President Park’s strategic ambiguity is warranted More
03/27/2015: Missile defense and South Korea: President Park’s strategic ambiguity is warranted More
03/26/2015: Saudi Arabia Forms a Pan-Arab Sunni Alliance Against the Houthis More
03/26/2015: Nudging Our Way towards Energy Efficiency: Psychology, Behavior and the Environment More
03/26/2015: New Research Examines History of National Debt Policies More
03/26/2015: Experts weigh in (part 2): How does ISIS approach Islamic scripture? More
03/26/2015: U.S.-Mexico High Level Economic Dialogue: A Progress Report More
03/26/2015: Abenomics' Progress in Reforming Japan's Economy: Panel I More
03/26/2015: Abenomics' Progress in Reforming Japan's Economy: Panel II More
03/26/2015: Abenomics' Progress in Reforming Japan's Economy: Keynote by Heizo Takenaka More
03/26/2015: Abenomics' Progress in Reforming Japan's Economy: Panel III More
03/26/2015: Who Holds Euro Assets? We Still Don't Know More
03/26/2015: Dreier Roundtable keynotes focus on bridging immigration divide in Washington More
03/26/2015: Why U.S. airstrikes in Tikrit are good for the U.S. and Iraq More
03/26/2015: Event: Abenomics' Progress in Reforming Japan's Economy More
03/26/2015: The SGR Fix Will Bust the Budget More
03/26/2015: Abenomics' Progress in Reforming Japan's Economy: Comments by Adam Posen More
03/26/2015: Spring Regulation Issue: Oil, Obamacare and Tech Innovation More
03/26/2015: An Alan and Jane Batkin International Leaders Forum with Chief Executive Officer of Afghanistan Abdullah Abdullah More
03/26/2015: An Alan and Jane Batkin International Leaders Forum with Chief Executive Officer of Afghanistan Abdullah Abdullah More
03/26/2015: Abenomics' Progress in Reforming Japan's Economy: Panel III More
03/26/2015: Abenomics' Progress in Reforming Japan's Economy: Keynote by Heizo Takenaka More
03/26/2015: Abenomics' Progress in Reforming Japan's Economy: Panel II More
03/26/2015: Abenomics' Progress in Reforming Japan's Economy: Panel I More
03/26/2015: Elusive as Ever: The State of Iranian-Russian Cooperation More
03/26/2015: The End of a Cycle in Latin America and its Associated Risks More
03/26/2015: The Hutchins Center Explains: Budget Resolutions More
03/26/2015: The Monetary Approach Reigns Supreme More
03/26/2015: Hutchins Roundup: Mortgage Rates, Macroprudential Policies, and More More
03/26/2015: Hutchins Roundup: Mortgage Rates, Macroprudential Policies, and More More
03/26/2015: Bridging the immigration divide: Forging a bipartisan policy on visas for STEM graduates More
03/26/2015: China Needs More Market -- and Individualism -- and Less State More
03/25/2015: Book Talk: "Gulag Town, Company Town Forced Labor and Its Legacy in Vorkuta" More
03/25/2015: Adam Posen: Closing Remarks: Monetary Policy Measures in a Persistent Low Inflation World More
More...
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2015