Sat. October 25, 2014 Get Published  Get Alerts
HOME  |LOGIN
ABOUT | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US
Syria and the Arab Uprisings: A Special Case

Comments(1)
Initially, only five Syrian protestors stood in al Hamidiya market on March 15, 2011 to protest the murder of young students accused of wearing anti-government graffiti. They shouted in Arabic: ‘we sacrifice our blood and souls for you Syria.’ Since then an estimated 22,000 Syrians, and counting, have been killed by the Assad regime to quell the pro-democracy demonstrations.

Although all Arab Spring countries shared common denominators of external pressure and internal violence, yet Syria remains a unique case because of the Cold War behavior the country conjures from its allies. In some prospects, Syria is seen as a proxy territory by the anachronistic Cold War mentality held by the Russians, Chinese and their allies in the region (most notably Iran). Intervening powers must recognize the interests of Syria’s allies- Russia in particular-in order to stop the bloodshed, remove al Assad, and keep the Arab Spring in blossom.

Russia expresses sensitivity to the developments in Syria recognizing Damascus as one of its few remaining strongholds in the region. In fact, in Tartus Port on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean, under a 1971 agreement, renewed again in 2005, the one and only Russian naval shipping-deck in the Mediterranean is based there. Military analysts doubt the port’s functionality, which could be the case after exploring a few YouTube clips of the port’s old ships; nonetheless, the Kremlin appreciates it as a means to limiting Western influence in the Middle East, let alone a symbolic presence of Russia’s strength and global dominance.

Russia has a big stake in Syria today, not in al Assad by name. Damascus is one of the largest buyers of Russian weapons, third to only Venezuela and India. If Russia were to receive guarantees on military and economic roles in the new Syria, Moscow would be the first to support UN resolutions, and perhaps secretly demand al Assad to relinquish power and leave the country. The memories of Mikhail Gorbachev’s support, after being so reluctant at first, of UN Security Council Resolution 678 of 1990, which demanded Iraq to unconditionally withdraw from Kuwait, provide a base for optimism. Gorbachev’s support, as evidence later on revealed, was made possible through generous Saudi aid [bribe] amounted to four trillion dollars. 1

Likewise, China displays its own concerns fearing that sources of oil in the Middle East could be, for the most part, in the hands of Western states if the Syrian regime were to fall. Beijing worries itself with how authoritarian regimes- being one itself- are swiftly falling apart one after another. The domino effect sweeping the Middle East is real. In this regards, China identifies that overthrowing al Assad, adding to the list of former friends in Iraq and Libya, would possibly pave the path for the West to overthrow Ahmadinejad’s regime, which is of a strategic importance to China for oil imports. As of July, 2012, half of Iran’s oil exports are imported by China, Reuters reported. 2

By the same token, Iran views Syria as the corridor separating the Arab Spring from an inevitable Iranian Spring. Thus, by siding with Assad, Ahmadinejad in fact defends an advanced front. Further, as U.S. calls for Assad to abdicate power grows, the alliance between Tehran and Damascus grows accordingly out of common need, common goals and common cause.

The United States, on the other hand, favors and supports the idea of a Middle East without Assad for a host of reasons to include: backing up its rhetoric of democracy and freedom, acknowledging the concerns of its key regional allies’–in particular Israel, Saudi Arabia and Qatar- in addition to sincere concerns over the spread and leakage of WMDs in an inherently dangerous region.

Certainly, in the heart of Syria’s intractable problem lie disagreements among Russia, China and the United States; however, such discordance is not over the future of Assad. Moscow and Beijing understand that al Assad’s departure is inevitable. The Russian and Chinese discomfort exists in imagining the imminent post-Assad era. This is what stokes the cold war mentality. The continued failure to put an end to the Syrian massacre highlights the imperative need to address the Syrian case with its own merits. This requires a policy move away from treating all Arab protests as a singular unit.

To best abate al Assad is to tackle his sources of strengths and legitimacy: the military, the economy and Russia. After months of fruitless focus on weakening Syria’s military and economy , it is time for intervening powers to place much of their effort on Russia and identify that Syria’s military and economy are subordinates to Russia as an instrument to rid the country of the Assad regime.

1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8V_wHFSxtcw&feature=related

2 http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/07/17/iran-oil-idUKL6E8IHDPV20120717


Yasir Kuoti
TEL: 715-803-0274
Email: Yasir.kuoti@gmail.com

Yasir Kuoti is an Iraqi freelance writer based in Washington D.C. Mr. Kuoti is a contributor to the Atlantic Community where he writes and comments on the politics of the Arab world.

Comments in Chronological order (1 total comments)

Report Abuse
Tue, May 14, 2013 12:56 AM (about 12701 hours ago)
 
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
International Affairs
Forum - (2014 Issue 1)

Available Now
ANNOUNCEMENTS
THE WORLD'S DISCUSSING...
12/15/2014: Modern Times in North Korea: Scenes from its Founding Years, 1945-1950 More
12/01/2014: Waking from the Dream: the Struggle for Civil Rights in the Shadow of Martin Luther King More
11/30/2014: Reaching Across the Pacific: Latin America and Asia in the New Century More
11/25/2014: La explosión de la inversión exterior Latinoamericana: tendencias y evolución reciente de las multilatinas More
11/17/2014: The Men Who Lost America: British Leadership, the Revolutionary World, and the Fate of Empire More
11/06/2014: Extreme Realities: Severe Weather, Climate Change, and Our National Security [Screening] More
10/28/2014: Bridging the Gap: A Conversation About Family Planning and Climate Change More
10/28/2014: FAPESP-U.S. Collaborative Research on the Amazon More
10/27/2014: Synchronized Factories: Latin America and the Caribbean in the Era of Global Value Chains More
10/27/2014: Sino-Soviet Relations and the Dilemmas of Socialist Bloc Cooperation: Czechoslovaks in Shanghai, 1956-57 More
10/24/2014: The Future of Syria: A History Lesson More
10/24/2014: What the New Multilateralism Means: A Development Bank Leadership Perspective More
10/24/2014: Impact of Low Oil Prices: Petro Power or Petro Poverty? More
10/24/2014: Africa in the News: Botswana Votes; Global African Investment Summit Held in London; Boko Haram Cease-fire Appears to Fold More
10/24/2014: Bruce Katz on Sirius XM: The U.S. Is the Most Metropolitan of Nations More
10/24/2014: 2014 Midterms: Regardless of Party, the Incoming Congress Needs to Support Ukraine More
10/24/2014: Consumers Win as WTO Condemns Protectionist Meat Labels More
10/24/2014: Today's Deficit is not the Problem More
10/24/2014: Cutting off ISIS' Cash Flow More
10/24/2014: Development blog: A Burning Issue for Indonesia’s New Jokowi Administration More
10/23/2014: “A Sort of Chautauqua” More
10/23/2014: Teleconference Ukraine: Elections Amid Ceasefire and Conflict More
10/23/2014: Axel Weber: The Global Macroeconomic Outlook More
10/23/2014: Now Accepting Intern Applications for Spring 2015 Semester More
10/23/2014: World Population and Human Capital in the Twenty-first Century (Book Launch) More
10/23/2014: Is Democracy Failing? More
10/23/2014: Global Health blog: What Can Donors Learn from HIV in Responding to Ebola? More
10/23/2014: Restraint or Preeminence in U.S. Grand Strategy? More
10/23/2014: Will Rising Democracies Adopt Pro-Human Rights Foreign Policies? More
10/23/2014: Putin’s Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia? More
10/23/2014: Former Kennan Scholar wins the American Historical Association's Albert J. Beveridge Award More
10/23/2014: Development blog: Could Contract Transparency Be Bad? More
10/23/2014: Three Keys to Understand the 2015 Budget Debate in Mexico More
10/23/2014: TPP and the Political Economy of U.S.-Japan Trade Negotiations More
10/23/2014: Hutchins Roundup: The Optimal Top Marginal Tax Rate, the Economic Benefits of Bankruptcy Protection, and More More
10/23/2014: Hutchins Roundup: The Optimal Top Marginal Tax Rate, the Economic Benefits of Bankruptcy Protection, and More More
10/23/2014: Hutchins Roundup: The Optimal Top Marginal Tax Rate, the Economic Benefits of Bankruptcy Protection, and More More
10/23/2014: Marijuana Policy in Colorado More
10/23/2014: Official Financial Flows, Capital Mobility, and Global Imbalances More
10/23/2014: 2014 Midterms: Congressional Elections and the Obama Climate Legacy More
10/23/2014: 2014 Midterms: Congressional Elections and the Obama Climate Legacy More
10/23/2014: The Trans-Pacific Partnership's Missing Ingredient More
10/23/2014: Marshall's Postwar Logic Holds True in Ukraine Today More
10/22/2014: Establishing China’s Modern Fiscal System More
10/22/2014: Establishing China’s Modern Fiscal System More
10/22/2014: Can Oil Sanctions Push Russian Economy Into Recession? More
10/22/2014: Ukraine, Russia, and the International Order More
10/22/2014: From Barrier to Opportunity: Unlocking the Complex Economic Dynamics of the US-Mexico Border More
10/22/2014: The German Economy Needs Reforms, Not More Spending More
10/22/2014: Dairy Policy in Canada and the United States More
More...
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2014