Fri. July 01, 2016 Get Published  Get Alerts
Syria and the Arab Uprisings: A Special Case

Initially, only five Syrian protestors stood in al Hamidiya market on March 15, 2011 to protest the murder of young students accused of wearing anti-government graffiti. They shouted in Arabic: ‘we sacrifice our blood and souls for you Syria.’ Since then an estimated 22,000 Syrians, and counting, have been killed by the Assad regime to quell the pro-democracy demonstrations.

Although all Arab Spring countries shared common denominators of external pressure and internal violence, yet Syria remains a unique case because of the Cold War behavior the country conjures from its allies. In some prospects, Syria is seen as a proxy territory by the anachronistic Cold War mentality held by the Russians, Chinese and their allies in the region (most notably Iran). Intervening powers must recognize the interests of Syria’s allies- Russia in particular-in order to stop the bloodshed, remove al Assad, and keep the Arab Spring in blossom.

Russia expresses sensitivity to the developments in Syria recognizing Damascus as one of its few remaining strongholds in the region. In fact, in Tartus Port on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean, under a 1971 agreement, renewed again in 2005, the one and only Russian naval shipping-deck in the Mediterranean is based there. Military analysts doubt the port’s functionality, which could be the case after exploring a few YouTube clips of the port’s old ships; nonetheless, the Kremlin appreciates it as a means to limiting Western influence in the Middle East, let alone a symbolic presence of Russia’s strength and global dominance.

Russia has a big stake in Syria today, not in al Assad by name. Damascus is one of the largest buyers of Russian weapons, third to only Venezuela and India. If Russia were to receive guarantees on military and economic roles in the new Syria, Moscow would be the first to support UN resolutions, and perhaps secretly demand al Assad to relinquish power and leave the country. The memories of Mikhail Gorbachev’s support, after being so reluctant at first, of UN Security Council Resolution 678 of 1990, which demanded Iraq to unconditionally withdraw from Kuwait, provide a base for optimism. Gorbachev’s support, as evidence later on revealed, was made possible through generous Saudi aid [bribe] amounted to four trillion dollars. 1

Likewise, China displays its own concerns fearing that sources of oil in the Middle East could be, for the most part, in the hands of Western states if the Syrian regime were to fall. Beijing worries itself with how authoritarian regimes- being one itself- are swiftly falling apart one after another. The domino effect sweeping the Middle East is real. In this regards, China identifies that overthrowing al Assad, adding to the list of former friends in Iraq and Libya, would possibly pave the path for the West to overthrow Ahmadinejad’s regime, which is of a strategic importance to China for oil imports. As of July, 2012, half of Iran’s oil exports are imported by China, Reuters reported. 2

By the same token, Iran views Syria as the corridor separating the Arab Spring from an inevitable Iranian Spring. Thus, by siding with Assad, Ahmadinejad in fact defends an advanced front. Further, as U.S. calls for Assad to abdicate power grows, the alliance between Tehran and Damascus grows accordingly out of common need, common goals and common cause.

The United States, on the other hand, favors and supports the idea of a Middle East without Assad for a host of reasons to include: backing up its rhetoric of democracy and freedom, acknowledging the concerns of its key regional allies’–in particular Israel, Saudi Arabia and Qatar- in addition to sincere concerns over the spread and leakage of WMDs in an inherently dangerous region.

Certainly, in the heart of Syria’s intractable problem lie disagreements among Russia, China and the United States; however, such discordance is not over the future of Assad. Moscow and Beijing understand that al Assad’s departure is inevitable. The Russian and Chinese discomfort exists in imagining the imminent post-Assad era. This is what stokes the cold war mentality. The continued failure to put an end to the Syrian massacre highlights the imperative need to address the Syrian case with its own merits. This requires a policy move away from treating all Arab protests as a singular unit.

To best abate al Assad is to tackle his sources of strengths and legitimacy: the military, the economy and Russia. After months of fruitless focus on weakening Syria’s military and economy , it is time for intervening powers to place much of their effort on Russia and identify that Syria’s military and economy are subordinates to Russia as an instrument to rid the country of the Assad regime.



Yasir Kuoti
TEL: 715-803-0274

Yasir Kuoti is an Iraqi freelance writer based in Washington D.C. Mr. Kuoti is a contributor to the Atlantic Community where he writes and comments on the politics of the Arab world.

Comments in Chronological order (1 total comments)

Report Abuse
Tue, May 14, 2013 12:56 AM (about 27467 hours ago)
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
06/30/2016: Should the US try to run a trade surplus? More
06/30/2016: What Brookings experts are saying about Brexit More
06/30/2016: WATCH: Brookings experts discuss Brexit More
06/30/2016: Should Airbnb Use the First Amendment as a Shield in Regulatory Fights? More
06/30/2016: The Brexit contagion could consume the French elite next More
06/30/2016: The Elusive Trump Pivot on Torture More
06/30/2016: Comment amener L'Afrique a atteindre ses objectifs de developpement durable: Un aperçu sur les solutions energetiques transfrontalieres More
06/30/2016: How to make Africa meet sustainable development ends: A special glance at cross-border energy solutions More
06/30/2016: Trump and China More
06/30/2016: Hutchins Roundup: Natural interest rate, fiscal multipliers, and more More
06/30/2016: Hutchins Roundup: Natural interest rate, fiscal multipliers, and more More
06/30/2016: How This Election Turned Me into a Libertarian More
06/30/2016: One year after Sousse, it’s the economy—not security—that worries Tunisians More
06/30/2016: Globalization: What the West can learn from Asia More
06/30/2016: Viewing Brexit through a digital lens More
06/29/2016: Brexit sends shockwaves: What now? More
06/29/2016: U.K. innovation districts and Brexit: Keep calm and carry on More
06/29/2016: Brazil and the international order: Getting back on track More
06/29/2016: Why I like the Volkswagen emissions settlement More
06/29/2016: Why I like the Volkswagen emissions settlement More
06/29/2016: The Brexit contagion myth More
06/29/2016: The Democrats' New National Security Strategy More
06/29/2016: Meeting the challenge of sustainable infrastructure: The role of public policy More
06/29/2016: Meeting the challenge of sustainable infrastructure: The role of public policy More
06/29/2016: Brexit: The first major casualty of digital democracy More
06/29/2016: Is Political Control over Charter Schools Wise? More
06/29/2016: Brexit: What Now? More
06/29/2016: Yes, Gary Johnson Could Make It into the Debates. Here's How. More
06/29/2016: Obamacare and Executive Overreach More
06/29/2016: Countering violent extremism programs are not the solution to Orlando mass shooting More
06/28/2016: 5 Myths about Brexit, Debunked More
06/28/2016: Immigration Order Didn’t Just Set Priorities, It Changed Law More
06/28/2016: Brexit ushers in a sea of troubles More
06/28/2016: Brexit ushers in a sea of troubles More
06/28/2016: Economic implications of Brexit More
06/28/2016: 5 takeaways from the 2016 Medicare trustees report More
06/28/2016: How Much Do Americans Really Fear ISIS? More
06/28/2016: Brexit lesson: Governance matters More
06/28/2016: After Brexit, U.S. will need a new "BFF" More
06/28/2016: Confirmation Chaos and Constitutional Corruption More
06/28/2016: Political Earthquake Hits as British Exit EU More
06/28/2016: America Must Stay out of Syria's War More
06/28/2016: Does Brexit portend the end of European unity? More
06/28/2016: Does Brexit portend the end of European unity? More
06/28/2016: Post-Vote Eurocrats Want to Rush Brits out the Door More
06/28/2016: Options for Federal Privatization and Reform Lessons from Abroad More
06/28/2016: Aspirational Power : Brazil on the Long Road to Global Influence More
06/27/2016: Gun Policy Is Hard More
06/27/2016: Europe after Brexit: Never waste a good crisis More
06/27/2016: Brexit aftermath: The West’s decline and China’s rise More
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2016