Sun. May 29, 2016 Get Published  Get Alerts
HOME  |LOGIN
ABOUT | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US
Syria and the Arab Uprisings: A Special Case

Comments(1)
Initially, only five Syrian protestors stood in al Hamidiya market on March 15, 2011 to protest the murder of young students accused of wearing anti-government graffiti. They shouted in Arabic: ‘we sacrifice our blood and souls for you Syria.’ Since then an estimated 22,000 Syrians, and counting, have been killed by the Assad regime to quell the pro-democracy demonstrations.

Although all Arab Spring countries shared common denominators of external pressure and internal violence, yet Syria remains a unique case because of the Cold War behavior the country conjures from its allies. In some prospects, Syria is seen as a proxy territory by the anachronistic Cold War mentality held by the Russians, Chinese and their allies in the region (most notably Iran). Intervening powers must recognize the interests of Syria’s allies- Russia in particular-in order to stop the bloodshed, remove al Assad, and keep the Arab Spring in blossom.

Russia expresses sensitivity to the developments in Syria recognizing Damascus as one of its few remaining strongholds in the region. In fact, in Tartus Port on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean, under a 1971 agreement, renewed again in 2005, the one and only Russian naval shipping-deck in the Mediterranean is based there. Military analysts doubt the port’s functionality, which could be the case after exploring a few YouTube clips of the port’s old ships; nonetheless, the Kremlin appreciates it as a means to limiting Western influence in the Middle East, let alone a symbolic presence of Russia’s strength and global dominance.

Russia has a big stake in Syria today, not in al Assad by name. Damascus is one of the largest buyers of Russian weapons, third to only Venezuela and India. If Russia were to receive guarantees on military and economic roles in the new Syria, Moscow would be the first to support UN resolutions, and perhaps secretly demand al Assad to relinquish power and leave the country. The memories of Mikhail Gorbachev’s support, after being so reluctant at first, of UN Security Council Resolution 678 of 1990, which demanded Iraq to unconditionally withdraw from Kuwait, provide a base for optimism. Gorbachev’s support, as evidence later on revealed, was made possible through generous Saudi aid [bribe] amounted to four trillion dollars. 1

Likewise, China displays its own concerns fearing that sources of oil in the Middle East could be, for the most part, in the hands of Western states if the Syrian regime were to fall. Beijing worries itself with how authoritarian regimes- being one itself- are swiftly falling apart one after another. The domino effect sweeping the Middle East is real. In this regards, China identifies that overthrowing al Assad, adding to the list of former friends in Iraq and Libya, would possibly pave the path for the West to overthrow Ahmadinejad’s regime, which is of a strategic importance to China for oil imports. As of July, 2012, half of Iran’s oil exports are imported by China, Reuters reported. 2

By the same token, Iran views Syria as the corridor separating the Arab Spring from an inevitable Iranian Spring. Thus, by siding with Assad, Ahmadinejad in fact defends an advanced front. Further, as U.S. calls for Assad to abdicate power grows, the alliance between Tehran and Damascus grows accordingly out of common need, common goals and common cause.

The United States, on the other hand, favors and supports the idea of a Middle East without Assad for a host of reasons to include: backing up its rhetoric of democracy and freedom, acknowledging the concerns of its key regional allies’–in particular Israel, Saudi Arabia and Qatar- in addition to sincere concerns over the spread and leakage of WMDs in an inherently dangerous region.

Certainly, in the heart of Syria’s intractable problem lie disagreements among Russia, China and the United States; however, such discordance is not over the future of Assad. Moscow and Beijing understand that al Assad’s departure is inevitable. The Russian and Chinese discomfort exists in imagining the imminent post-Assad era. This is what stokes the cold war mentality. The continued failure to put an end to the Syrian massacre highlights the imperative need to address the Syrian case with its own merits. This requires a policy move away from treating all Arab protests as a singular unit.

To best abate al Assad is to tackle his sources of strengths and legitimacy: the military, the economy and Russia. After months of fruitless focus on weakening Syria’s military and economy , it is time for intervening powers to place much of their effort on Russia and identify that Syria’s military and economy are subordinates to Russia as an instrument to rid the country of the Assad regime.

1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8V_wHFSxtcw&feature=related

2 http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/07/17/iran-oil-idUKL6E8IHDPV20120717


Yasir Kuoti
TEL: 715-803-0274
Email: Yasir.kuoti@gmail.com

Yasir Kuoti is an Iraqi freelance writer based in Washington D.C. Mr. Kuoti is a contributor to the Atlantic Community where he writes and comments on the politics of the Arab world.

Comments in Chronological order (1 total comments)

Report Abuse
Tue, May 14, 2013 12:56 AM (about 26669 hours ago)
 
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
ANNOUNCEMENTS
THE WORLD'S DISCUSSING...
05/29/2016: Reflections on the World Humanitarian Summit with the Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator More
05/27/2016: Banter #222: Tamra Ryan on the Women’s Bean Project More
05/27/2016: How to help close the tax gap More
05/27/2016: Child poverty in America is not a global embarrassment More
05/27/2016: Too Bad the Portman-Strickland Senate Race Has Turned into a China-Bashing Free-For-All More
05/27/2016: Africa in the news: Nigeria establishes flexible exchange rate, Kenya reaffirms plan to close Dabaab refugee camp, and AfDB meetings focus on energy needs More
05/27/2016: If US Won't Take More Syrian Refugees, Extend Trade Agreements to Those Who Do More
05/27/2016: Will ISIS and al-Qaida always be rivals? More
05/27/2016: Will ISIS and al-Qaida always be rivals? More
05/27/2016: Trade on Trial, Again More
05/27/2016: Overcoming barriers to a European digital single market More
05/26/2016: The incoherence of sustainability More
05/26/2016: Is there a shortcut to development for the Western Balkans? More
05/26/2016: Walk the line: The United States between Israel and the Palestinians More
05/26/2016: Long-range stand-off does not make sense, nor do its proposed numbers More
05/26/2016: Long-range stand-off does not make sense, nor do its proposed numbers More
05/26/2016: Long-range stand-off does not make sense, nor do its proposed numbers More
05/26/2016: Long-range stand-off does not make sense, nor do its proposed numbers More
05/26/2016: Hutchins Roundup: Labor market mobility, family disadvantage, and more More
05/26/2016: Hutchins Roundup: Labor market mobility, family disadvantage, and more More
05/26/2016: MSNBC's Morning Joe Whitewashes Bob Gates' Legacy More
05/26/2016: Voice, Exit, and Liberty: The Effect of Emigration on Origin Country Institutions More
05/26/2016: America's Doomed China Strategy More
05/26/2016: NATO Assesses Ukraine and Invites Montenegro: Who's Afraid of Vladimir Putin? More
05/26/2016: Blood and faith in Afghanistan: A June 2016 update More
05/26/2016: Blood and faith in Afghanistan: A June 2016 update More
05/26/2016: Blood and faith in Afghanistan: A June 2016 update More
05/25/2016: What might the drone strike against Mullah Mansour mean for the counterinsurgency endgame? More
05/25/2016: What might the drone strike against Mullah Mansour mean for the counterinsurgency endgame? More
05/25/2016: Monetary policy and financial stability More
05/25/2016: Monetary policy and financial stability More
05/25/2016: Behavioral interventions to increase tax-time saving: Evidence from a national randomized trial More
05/25/2016: Testimony before the European Parliament, Committee on International Trade More
05/25/2016: A Portrait in Courage More
05/25/2016: Don't Dilute Libertarianism Just to Beat Donald Trump More
05/25/2016: Is China Really That Dangerous? More
05/25/2016: For Southwest Corridor, Buses Would Be Better, Cheaper Than Light Rail More
05/24/2016: Dear Progressives: Using Uber Doesn't Make You a Monster More
05/24/2016: What Republicans for Trump Are Telling Me More
05/24/2016: A preview of the eighth U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue More
05/24/2016: How do we end energy poverty? More
05/24/2016: Show me the money: Fiscal and financial fundamentals of 21st century city governance More
05/24/2016: The U.S.-Saudi Arabia counterterrorism relationship More
05/24/2016: Not-so-great expectations: The G-7’s waning role in global economic governance More
05/24/2016: Implementing the European Union's Digital Single Market Strategy More
05/24/2016: Realism Restrained: the Washington Playbook Strikes Back More
05/24/2016: Hate Speech Laws: Ratifying the Assassin’s Veto More
05/24/2016: The European Union's Digital Single Market Strategy: A conflict between government's desire for certainty and rapid marketplace innovation More
05/23/2016: Putin battles for the Russian homefront in Syria More
05/23/2016: Putin battles for the Russian homefront in Syria More
More...
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2016