Sat. February 13, 2016 Get Published  Get Alerts
HOME  |LOGIN
ABOUT | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US
Syria and the Arab Uprisings: A Special Case

Comments(1)
Initially, only five Syrian protestors stood in al Hamidiya market on March 15, 2011 to protest the murder of young students accused of wearing anti-government graffiti. They shouted in Arabic: ‘we sacrifice our blood and souls for you Syria.’ Since then an estimated 22,000 Syrians, and counting, have been killed by the Assad regime to quell the pro-democracy demonstrations.

Although all Arab Spring countries shared common denominators of external pressure and internal violence, yet Syria remains a unique case because of the Cold War behavior the country conjures from its allies. In some prospects, Syria is seen as a proxy territory by the anachronistic Cold War mentality held by the Russians, Chinese and their allies in the region (most notably Iran). Intervening powers must recognize the interests of Syria’s allies- Russia in particular-in order to stop the bloodshed, remove al Assad, and keep the Arab Spring in blossom.

Russia expresses sensitivity to the developments in Syria recognizing Damascus as one of its few remaining strongholds in the region. In fact, in Tartus Port on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean, under a 1971 agreement, renewed again in 2005, the one and only Russian naval shipping-deck in the Mediterranean is based there. Military analysts doubt the port’s functionality, which could be the case after exploring a few YouTube clips of the port’s old ships; nonetheless, the Kremlin appreciates it as a means to limiting Western influence in the Middle East, let alone a symbolic presence of Russia’s strength and global dominance.

Russia has a big stake in Syria today, not in al Assad by name. Damascus is one of the largest buyers of Russian weapons, third to only Venezuela and India. If Russia were to receive guarantees on military and economic roles in the new Syria, Moscow would be the first to support UN resolutions, and perhaps secretly demand al Assad to relinquish power and leave the country. The memories of Mikhail Gorbachev’s support, after being so reluctant at first, of UN Security Council Resolution 678 of 1990, which demanded Iraq to unconditionally withdraw from Kuwait, provide a base for optimism. Gorbachev’s support, as evidence later on revealed, was made possible through generous Saudi aid [bribe] amounted to four trillion dollars. 1

Likewise, China displays its own concerns fearing that sources of oil in the Middle East could be, for the most part, in the hands of Western states if the Syrian regime were to fall. Beijing worries itself with how authoritarian regimes- being one itself- are swiftly falling apart one after another. The domino effect sweeping the Middle East is real. In this regards, China identifies that overthrowing al Assad, adding to the list of former friends in Iraq and Libya, would possibly pave the path for the West to overthrow Ahmadinejad’s regime, which is of a strategic importance to China for oil imports. As of July, 2012, half of Iran’s oil exports are imported by China, Reuters reported. 2

By the same token, Iran views Syria as the corridor separating the Arab Spring from an inevitable Iranian Spring. Thus, by siding with Assad, Ahmadinejad in fact defends an advanced front. Further, as U.S. calls for Assad to abdicate power grows, the alliance between Tehran and Damascus grows accordingly out of common need, common goals and common cause.

The United States, on the other hand, favors and supports the idea of a Middle East without Assad for a host of reasons to include: backing up its rhetoric of democracy and freedom, acknowledging the concerns of its key regional allies’–in particular Israel, Saudi Arabia and Qatar- in addition to sincere concerns over the spread and leakage of WMDs in an inherently dangerous region.

Certainly, in the heart of Syria’s intractable problem lie disagreements among Russia, China and the United States; however, such discordance is not over the future of Assad. Moscow and Beijing understand that al Assad’s departure is inevitable. The Russian and Chinese discomfort exists in imagining the imminent post-Assad era. This is what stokes the cold war mentality. The continued failure to put an end to the Syrian massacre highlights the imperative need to address the Syrian case with its own merits. This requires a policy move away from treating all Arab protests as a singular unit.

To best abate al Assad is to tackle his sources of strengths and legitimacy: the military, the economy and Russia. After months of fruitless focus on weakening Syria’s military and economy , it is time for intervening powers to place much of their effort on Russia and identify that Syria’s military and economy are subordinates to Russia as an instrument to rid the country of the Assad regime.

1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8V_wHFSxtcw&feature=related

2 http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/07/17/iran-oil-idUKL6E8IHDPV20120717


Yasir Kuoti
TEL: 715-803-0274
Email: Yasir.kuoti@gmail.com

Yasir Kuoti is an Iraqi freelance writer based in Washington D.C. Mr. Kuoti is a contributor to the Atlantic Community where he writes and comments on the politics of the Arab world.

Comments in Chronological order (1 total comments)

Report Abuse
Tue, May 14, 2013 12:56 AM (about 24124 hours ago)
 
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
ANNOUNCEMENTS
THE WORLD'S DISCUSSING...
02/12/2016: Sanders tugs at Democrats’ heartstrings More
02/12/2016: Solving Obama's Aleppo dilemma More
02/12/2016: Solving Obama's Aleppo dilemma More
02/12/2016: Chicago and Mexico City explore new paths for economic growth More
02/12/2016: Why is Ukraine stalling on reforms? More
02/12/2016: In Obama’s budget, a suggestion more multinational corporate profits are escaping U.S. taxes More
02/12/2016: Five rising democracies More
02/12/2016: Be careful what you wish for: Higher oil prices and slow growth may make for a perfect storm More
02/12/2016: Letting go, but not giving up: Implementation of Minsk II More
02/12/2016: Letting go, but not giving up: Implementation of Minsk II More
02/11/2016: What does China really want? More
02/11/2016: How Xi Jinping sees the world ... and why More
02/11/2016: Past as Prologue? What North Korea Teaches Us about Iran's Nuclear Program More
02/11/2016: Why India and Israel are bringing their relationship out from “under the carpet” More
02/11/2016: The Council of Economic Advisers: 70 years of advising the president More
02/11/2016: The Council of Economic Advisers: 70 years of advising the president More
02/11/2016: The African Union: Which way forward? More
02/11/2016: The African Union: Which way forward? More
02/11/2016: Hutchins Roundup: fiscal consolidation, commodity price shocks, and more More
02/11/2016: Hutchins Roundup: fiscal consolidation, commodity price shocks, and more More
02/11/2016: Obama, American Muslims, and our Constitutional Duplicity More
02/11/2016: Learning its lesson? What the Iran deal should teach China about sanctioning North Korea More
02/11/2016: Learning its lesson? What the Iran deal should teach China about sanctioning North Korea More
02/11/2016: A Green Mess: Is EPA in Hot Water over Alaska's Bristol Bay? More
02/11/2016: Is the Doha Round Over? The WTO’s Negotiating Agenda for 2016 and Beyond More
02/10/2016: The future of securing global cities More
02/10/2016: Tuesday’s other big news: Supreme Court stays Obama's Clean Power Plan More
02/10/2016: Why five emerging powers may determine the future of democracy around the world More
02/10/2016: Tremors in the Chinese economy: Debating the road ahead More
02/10/2016: Incentives Are the Key to Federal Land Management More
02/10/2016: Why Is Obama Still Killing Children? More
02/10/2016: Is Socialism Making a Comeback? More
02/10/2016: How the Fed and Congress could boost confidence More
02/09/2016: In Obama's budget, a case study on finding and closing tax loopholes More
02/09/2016: How much will climate change rules benefit Americans? More
02/09/2016: Should we worry about China’s economy? More
02/09/2016: Experts weigh in (part 3): Is ISIS good at governing? More
02/09/2016: Experts weigh in (part 3): Is ISIS good at governing? More
02/09/2016: When a disunited Europe meets transnational terrorism More
02/09/2016: When a disunited Europe meets transnational terrorism More
02/09/2016: Ted Cruz Should Make the Case for Telemedicine More
02/09/2016: Should Vladimir Putin be concerned about the Russian economy? More
02/09/2016: Europe, Welfare Migration, and Hypocrisy More
02/09/2016: A Free Society Requires Educational Freedom More
02/08/2016: It’s Groundhog Day with North Korea More
02/08/2016: It’s Groundhog Day with North Korea More
02/08/2016: It’s Groundhog Day with North Korea More
02/08/2016: Rhode Island needs to exploit its advantages More
02/08/2016: The Syrian refugee crisis and the United States More
02/08/2016: The Syrian refugee crisis and the United States More
More...
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2016