Tue. March 31, 2015 Get Published  Get Alerts
HOME  |LOGIN
ABOUT | CONTACT US | SUPPORT US
Syria and the Arab Uprisings: A Special Case

Comments(1)
Initially, only five Syrian protestors stood in al Hamidiya market on March 15, 2011 to protest the murder of young students accused of wearing anti-government graffiti. They shouted in Arabic: ‘we sacrifice our blood and souls for you Syria.’ Since then an estimated 22,000 Syrians, and counting, have been killed by the Assad regime to quell the pro-democracy demonstrations.

Although all Arab Spring countries shared common denominators of external pressure and internal violence, yet Syria remains a unique case because of the Cold War behavior the country conjures from its allies. In some prospects, Syria is seen as a proxy territory by the anachronistic Cold War mentality held by the Russians, Chinese and their allies in the region (most notably Iran). Intervening powers must recognize the interests of Syria’s allies- Russia in particular-in order to stop the bloodshed, remove al Assad, and keep the Arab Spring in blossom.

Russia expresses sensitivity to the developments in Syria recognizing Damascus as one of its few remaining strongholds in the region. In fact, in Tartus Port on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean, under a 1971 agreement, renewed again in 2005, the one and only Russian naval shipping-deck in the Mediterranean is based there. Military analysts doubt the port’s functionality, which could be the case after exploring a few YouTube clips of the port’s old ships; nonetheless, the Kremlin appreciates it as a means to limiting Western influence in the Middle East, let alone a symbolic presence of Russia’s strength and global dominance.

Russia has a big stake in Syria today, not in al Assad by name. Damascus is one of the largest buyers of Russian weapons, third to only Venezuela and India. If Russia were to receive guarantees on military and economic roles in the new Syria, Moscow would be the first to support UN resolutions, and perhaps secretly demand al Assad to relinquish power and leave the country. The memories of Mikhail Gorbachev’s support, after being so reluctant at first, of UN Security Council Resolution 678 of 1990, which demanded Iraq to unconditionally withdraw from Kuwait, provide a base for optimism. Gorbachev’s support, as evidence later on revealed, was made possible through generous Saudi aid [bribe] amounted to four trillion dollars. 1

Likewise, China displays its own concerns fearing that sources of oil in the Middle East could be, for the most part, in the hands of Western states if the Syrian regime were to fall. Beijing worries itself with how authoritarian regimes- being one itself- are swiftly falling apart one after another. The domino effect sweeping the Middle East is real. In this regards, China identifies that overthrowing al Assad, adding to the list of former friends in Iraq and Libya, would possibly pave the path for the West to overthrow Ahmadinejad’s regime, which is of a strategic importance to China for oil imports. As of July, 2012, half of Iran’s oil exports are imported by China, Reuters reported. 2

By the same token, Iran views Syria as the corridor separating the Arab Spring from an inevitable Iranian Spring. Thus, by siding with Assad, Ahmadinejad in fact defends an advanced front. Further, as U.S. calls for Assad to abdicate power grows, the alliance between Tehran and Damascus grows accordingly out of common need, common goals and common cause.

The United States, on the other hand, favors and supports the idea of a Middle East without Assad for a host of reasons to include: backing up its rhetoric of democracy and freedom, acknowledging the concerns of its key regional allies’–in particular Israel, Saudi Arabia and Qatar- in addition to sincere concerns over the spread and leakage of WMDs in an inherently dangerous region.

Certainly, in the heart of Syria’s intractable problem lie disagreements among Russia, China and the United States; however, such discordance is not over the future of Assad. Moscow and Beijing understand that al Assad’s departure is inevitable. The Russian and Chinese discomfort exists in imagining the imminent post-Assad era. This is what stokes the cold war mentality. The continued failure to put an end to the Syrian massacre highlights the imperative need to address the Syrian case with its own merits. This requires a policy move away from treating all Arab protests as a singular unit.

To best abate al Assad is to tackle his sources of strengths and legitimacy: the military, the economy and Russia. After months of fruitless focus on weakening Syria’s military and economy , it is time for intervening powers to place much of their effort on Russia and identify that Syria’s military and economy are subordinates to Russia as an instrument to rid the country of the Assad regime.

1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8V_wHFSxtcw&feature=related

2 http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/07/17/iran-oil-idUKL6E8IHDPV20120717


Yasir Kuoti
TEL: 715-803-0274
Email: Yasir.kuoti@gmail.com

Yasir Kuoti is an Iraqi freelance writer based in Washington D.C. Mr. Kuoti is a contributor to the Atlantic Community where he writes and comments on the politics of the Arab world.

Comments in Chronological order (1 total comments)

Report Abuse
Tue, May 14, 2013 12:56 AM (about 16471 hours ago)
 
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
International Affairs
Forum - (2014 Issue 1)

Available Now
ANNOUNCEMENTS
THE WORLD'S DISCUSSING...
04/15/2015: Galina Starovoitova Fellowship on Human Rights and Conflict Resolution 2015-16 More
04/15/2015: China's Foreign Policy in a New Era of Sino-Latin American Relations More
03/31/2015: South Asia Consultation on Maternal Health: Regional Dialogue and Way Forward More
03/31/2015: Event Summary: Climate Change Adaptation, Urban Planning, and the Private Sector in Colombia More
03/31/2015: Globalization in a time of turmoil: A conversation with Prime Minister Stefan Löfven of Sweden More
03/30/2015: Xi Jinping’s challenge is to be strong enough to loosen control More
03/30/2015: A Conversation with the President of Tanzania, Jakaya Kikwete More
03/30/2015: A Path to Win the War on Pollution? Environmental Law Reform in China More
03/30/2015: China 1945 / U.S.-China 2015 More
03/30/2015: A cautious hope for the future of Afghanistan More
03/30/2015: A cautious hope for the future of Afghanistan More
03/30/2015: Assessing U.S. Sanctions: Impact, Effectiveness, Consequences More
03/30/2015: Hafu: The Mixed-Race Experience in Japan More
03/30/2015: Showing a new way forward? Implications of Mexico’s pledge for global climate action More
03/30/2015: Showing a new way forward? Implications of Mexico’s pledge for global climate action More
03/30/2015: Trade and the digital economy: Opportunities for U.S.-Japan global leadership More
03/30/2015: Cato Institute Welcomes New CEO More
03/30/2015: Why are interest rates so low? More
03/30/2015: Inaugurating a new blog More
03/30/2015: “The European Time” of China’s Overseas Investment More
03/30/2015: American and Japanese scholars view China's security and foreign policies More
03/30/2015: American and Japanese scholars view China's security and foreign policies More
03/29/2015: Arvind Subramanian: Beginning a New Era: India’s Union Budget 2015-16 More
03/27/2015: Island Communities: Resilience in the Face of Climate Change More
03/27/2015: Throw the Bums Out More
03/27/2015: Increasing Transparency at the IAEA Archives More
03/27/2015: Can the U.S. Have Normal Diplomatic Relations with Cuba? More
03/27/2015: New leadership on climate as Mexico launches its National Contribution for climate deal in Paris More
03/27/2015: New leadership on climate as Mexico launches its National Contribution for climate deal in Paris More
03/27/2015: IDB creates new institution for private sector operations More
03/27/2015: What does China having the largest GDP mean? More
03/27/2015: Politico Presents …. Washington Lobbyists! More
03/27/2015: Afghanistan Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah lays out clear parameters for future negotiations with Taliban More
03/27/2015: How about Spending Cuts Instead of Sanders's War Tax? More
03/27/2015: What do the China Development Forum, Lee Kuan Yew, and the World Bank have in common? More
03/27/2015: FEMA Tells Oklahoma to Do the Impossible ... Or Else More
03/27/2015: Missile defense and South Korea: President Park’s strategic ambiguity is warranted More
03/27/2015: Missile defense and South Korea: President Park’s strategic ambiguity is warranted More
03/26/2015: Saudi Arabia Forms a Pan-Arab Sunni Alliance Against the Houthis More
03/26/2015: Nudging Our Way towards Energy Efficiency: Psychology, Behavior and the Environment More
03/26/2015: New Research Examines History of National Debt Policies More
03/26/2015: Experts weigh in (part 2): How does ISIS approach Islamic scripture? More
03/26/2015: U.S.-Mexico High Level Economic Dialogue: A Progress Report More
03/26/2015: Abenomics' Progress in Reforming Japan's Economy: Panel I More
03/26/2015: Abenomics' Progress in Reforming Japan's Economy: Panel II More
03/26/2015: Abenomics' Progress in Reforming Japan's Economy: Keynote by Heizo Takenaka More
03/26/2015: Abenomics' Progress in Reforming Japan's Economy: Panel III More
03/26/2015: Who Holds Euro Assets? We Still Don't Know More
03/26/2015: Dreier Roundtable keynotes focus on bridging immigration divide in Washington More
03/26/2015: Why U.S. airstrikes in Tikrit are good for the U.S. and Iraq More
More...
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2015