By David Allouch

The Arab Spring that spread throughout the last years in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt and Syria didn’t seem to effectively reach the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. In fact, the Palestinians territories stayed mostly outside the Arab Revolutions. The Arab Spring model didn’t permit Palestinians to overcome their political divisions between the two corrupted leaderships, Fatah and Hamas. Divisions between the two main Palestinians movement started 8 years ago in June 2007, when Hamas won the elections and took control of the Gaza Strip by force of arms. Since then, Palestinians Territories are divided into two territorial entities, one controlled by Hamas and funded by Qatar, the other one controlled by Fatah and funded by the European Union and US. An Arab Spring in Palestine could have helped to bring down the existed regime and their high degree of corruption, to replace it with a new one.

Indeed, despite the changing political landscapes in the Arab World and the subsequent Revolution in neighboring countries such as Egypt, the Palestinians stayed mostly out of this popular movement. The small outburst of popular protests that broke out in subsequent years such as the April 29 movement in 2015, have been futile. These outbursts of protests are happening once again today in Palestine, but this time, instead of being directed toward Fatah or Hamas, they are directed directly toward Israeli Troops, that are occupying the West Bank.

These clashes have been conveyed mostly by social media sites. Facebook, for instance, has been at the heart of these clashes, permitting the Palestinians people to express their anger and despair. Social medias have served as platforms for young citizens to criticize and express their discontent toward Fatah and Hamas, which are no longer sacred in the eyes of the 1990s generation, considered the main force behind the recent uprising. Today, the new generation is rising against the Israeli forces on their own, and do not receive their orders from any political party or any leader.

It would be wrong to say that the current uprising is being led through social media. Social networking sites such as Facebook or Twitter are acting as the main means to mobilize and push young people into action, as most events are prepared and called upon through social communication channels on the internet and not through traditional political parties anymore. The absence of any leadership in charge, whether on the field or on the social media clearly show that the political parties don’t have any actual control on the new events and clearly don’t have any ability to stimulate them.

There are in fact clear similarities between the Palestinian uprising and the Arab Spring in terms of using the social media to collect support and the absence of anyone leading the movement.

However, there is a major difference that needs to be pointed out. The Arab Spring Revolutions were against the different Arab regimes and their internal despotic structures, while the Palestinian uprising is against an occupation force. The fact that the Palestinians are rebelling against a well-structured foreign military force, makes the task more difficult. Israeli soldiers, unlike those in the Egyptian or Tunisian Army, have no connection whatsoever to the Palestinian population and cannot be influenced as the Egyptian soldiers were. This makes it more difficult for the Palestinians, especially given the harsh punishment measures set by the Israel forces such as preventive arrests, or house demolition.

Social media and free communication on the internet at large have raised a new sense of awareness among young people, pushing them to adopt a new rhetoric of patriotism, not connected to any faction or partisan affiliations. In an Oct. 19 post on his now-deleted Facebook account, Ahmed al-Herbawi, 19, who died on the eastern border of the Gaza Strip after taking a bullet in the chest, wrote, “I do not stand with the Ramallah authority, nor with Hamas, the party of hypocrisy, injustice and lies.”

The fact that no Palestinian political parties have officially claimed the leadership of the current uprising is a clear proof that young Palestinians are its lifeblood. This young generation is quietly but surely generating a local Arab Spring in Palestine.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly strongly condemned social networks such as Facebook, for instigating and igniting escalation in Jerusalem and the West Bank. He even declared recently in one of his speech, “The main battle should be focused against the instigating social media networks.”

The success of the this silent revolution might reside in the ambiguous aspect and secret identity of the people behind it, which makes it very popular among the young Palestinians, and worry the Palestinian Authority Security Services that seem to have no control on the situation. Young Palestinians are the clear leaders of this spontaneous outbursts of protests and are, for the first time in Palestinian history, working under the banner of one national flag rather than the banner of one party. Young Palestinians have gone beyond the different factions, acting on their own without any directives, as the Palestinians factions have proved in the past years unable to bring any positive changes for the population.

As reported in elnnews.com, Bahaa Alian, 22, who died attacking Israelis on a Jerusalem bus on Oct. 13, was a living example of the will of the young people to distance themselves from the banners of the political parties. “I ask the different factions not to embrace and adopt my martyrdom, as I died for the sake of my homeland, not yours,“ he said 10 months before he carried out his attack.

A statistical study published Nov. 9 by the Jerusalem Center for Israeli and Palestinian Affairs Studies showed that among the overall attacks carried out by Palestinians since the beginning of October, lone operations account for 60%, 22% had organizational connections and 18% were affiliated with groups — which does not mean that the organizations or groups claimed the attacks, clarified the study.

A Jerusalem teenager declared to a local newspaper, Al Monitor Palestine, “despair is the main thing pushing young Palestinians to rise up. We are the generation of disappointments and losses. We have lived through the recent wars, blockade, infighting, the failed Palestinian reconciliation and peace process, and the false promises to open crossings and improve the situation.”

The tensions in the West Bank and Jerusalem are reaching a peak, but Palestinians seem reluctant to call this Revolution the “Palestinian Arab Spring” because the Arab Spring revolutions brought nothing but disaster to much of the Arab World (Libya and Syria are now in the midst of a Civil War, while Tunisia and Egypt are now struggling with Salafis/Jihadi groups). That is one of the reason most of the young Palestinians prefer to give it another name, more positive.

David Allouche is the founder of young-diplomats.com. He holds a MA in International Relations and Strategic Affairs. He wrote for Nocamels, The Times of Israel The Jerusalem Post as an accredited journalist. He is currently an analyst specialized in the Middle East.